STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF PROCEDURAL SOUNDNESS AND RELIABILITY

被引:7
作者
Torretta, Vincenzo [1 ]
Capodaglio, Andrea G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Theoret & Appl Sci, Via GB Vico 46, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Via Ferrata, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | 2017年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
criticism; reliability; Strategic Environmental Assessment; territorial planning; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.30638/eemj.2017.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is both a technical and administrative procedure with (mandatory) extensive application throughout Europe, holding a primary role in sustainable territorial development. Objectives of the SEA process are to: provide a high level of protection for the environment, and promote sustainability of development by contributing to the integration of appropriate environmental considerations in the adoption and implementation of specific plans and programs. In general, results of SEA application are quite positive, but some aspects may still be subject to a constructive critique, with considerable space for procedural improvement. Purpose of this work is to analyze a few case studies, which refer to the situation in Italy and, specifically, in the Lombardy Region, after a significantly extended period of SEA application, and evaluate their outcomes, suggesting possible ameliorations. Lombardy makes a good benchmark for examination, being a complex territory, characterized by the highest concentrations of population, industrial activities, and economic interests in Italy. Case studies' evaluation reveals some critical issues that may have a negative influence on the correct application of the SEA process (and not just in Italy, as these considerations can be extended at the international level), and consequently on the resulting governance of the territory, and on the determination of foreseen effects related to development goals. Among critical issues, frequent oversight of important aspects concerning sustainability, incorrect definition of players and stakeholders, variations and differences of the applied techniques, debatable role of both the public administration and the public, varying costs of the procedure, to state a few, could be mentioned. Furthermore, a critical need is the definition of specific standards and parameters in the presence of activities that may present risks of relevant accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries
    Alshuwaikhat, HM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2005, 25 (04) : 307 - 317
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, European Commission Green Paper Luxembourg also known as Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) or Blair House Agreement
  • [3] Framework and operational procedure for implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in China
    Bao, CK
    Lu, YS
    Shang, JC
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2004, 24 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [4] Cumulative effects in SEA of spatial plans - evidence from Italy and England
    Bragagnolo, Chiara
    Geneletti, Davide
    Fischer, Thomas B.
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2012, 30 (02) : 100 - 110
  • [5] Carestia M, 2016, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V15, P905
  • [6] Industrial Risk in the Lombardy Region (Italy): What People Perceive and What Are the Gaps to Improve the Risk Communication and the Participatory Processes
    Di Mauro, Carmelo
    Bouchon, Sara
    Torretta, Vincenzo
    [J]. CISAP5: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS & POWER INDUSTRY, PT 1, 2012, 26 : 297 - 302
  • [7] Fidanza A., 2011, DEV ENV POSSIBLE INT
  • [8] Fischer T. B, 2003, UVP REPORT, V17, P29
  • [9] Much ado about SEA/SA monitoring: The performance of English Regional Spatial Strategies, and some German comparisons
    Hanusch, Marie
    Glasson, John
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2008, 28 (08) : 601 - 617
  • [10] Converging impact assessment discourses for sustainable development: The case of Flanders, Belgium
    Hugé J.
    Waas T.
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2011, 13 (3) : 607 - 626