Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception

被引:140
作者
Ares, Gaston [1 ]
Deliza, Rosires [2 ,3 ]
Barreiro, Cecilia [1 ]
Gimenez, Ana [1 ]
Gambaro, Adriana [1 ]
机构
[1] Uni Republ, Fac Quim, Dept Ciencia & Tecnol Alimentos, Secc Evaluac Sensorial, Montevideo 11800, Uruguay
[2] Embrapa Labex Europe, F-34394 Montpellier 5, France
[3] INRA, UMR Flav, F-21065 Dijon, France
关键词
Sensory profiling; Consumer research; Projective mapping; Check-all-that-apply; Milk desserts; Multiple factor analysis; Hierarchical multiple factor analysis; MULTIPLE FACTOR-ANALYSIS; WINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.10.006
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Eight chocolate milk desserts with different formulation were evaluated by two groups of consumers. Fifty consumers evaluated the samples and indicated their overall liking and answered a CATA question. Meanwhile, 40 consumers elicited up to four words to describe the desserts and completed a projective mapping task. Projective mapping and the check-all-that-apply question provided very similar sensory profiles for the evaluated milk desserts. Differences in the sensory characteristics of the samples were explained by differences in their formulations, which suggest the validity of the sensory profiles given by consumers. Projective mapping and the CATA question consisted on valuable tools to understand their perception of the sensory and hedonic characteristics of the desserts. These methodologies could consist on useful and interesting complimentary techniques to trained assessors' data, being CATA question easier to understand and less time consuming for consumers. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ADAMS J, 2007, 7 PANGB SENS S 12 16
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, UNI EN ISO 8589
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [4] Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques
    Ares, Gaston
    Gimenez, Ana
    Barreiro, Cecilia
    Gambaro, Adriana
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2010, 21 (03) : 286 - 294
  • [5] Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data
    Becue-Bertaut, Monica
    Pages, Jerome
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2008, 52 (06) : 3255 - 3268
  • [6] Rating of products through scores and free-text assertions:: Comparing and combining both
    Becue-Bertaut, Monica
    Alvarez-Esteban, Ramon
    Pages, Jerome
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2008, 19 (01) : 122 - 134
  • [7] Carr B.T., 1999, Sensory evaluation techniques
  • [8] An alternative to external preference mapping based on consumer perceptive mapping
    Faye, Pauline
    Bremaud, Damien
    Teillet, Eric
    Courcoux, Philippe
    Giboreau, Agnes
    Nicod, Huguette
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2006, 17 (7-8) : 604 - 614
  • [9] GACULA MC, 1993, DESIGN ANAL SENSORY, P211
  • [10] Internal and external mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price
    Guinard, JX
    Uotani, B
    Schlich, P
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2001, 12 (04) : 243 - 255