Quantum-information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics

被引:583
作者
Blais, Alexandre [1 ]
Gambetta, Jay
Wallraff, A.
Schuster, D. I.
Girvin, S. M.
Devoret, M. H.
Schoelkopf, R. J.
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Appl Phys, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Phys, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Phys, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Regroupement Quebecois Mat Pointe, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[5] ETH, Dept Phys, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2007年 / 75卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032329
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We theoretically study single and two-qubit dynamics in the circuit QED architecture. We focus on the current experimental design [Wallraff , Nature (London) 431, 162 (2004); Schuster , ibid. 445, 515 (2007)] in which superconducting charge qubits are capacitively coupled to a single high-Q superconducting coplanar resonator. In this system, logical gates are realized by driving the resonator with microwave fields. Advantages of this architecture are that it allows for multiqubit gates between non-nearest qubits and for the realization of gates in parallel, opening the possibility of fault-tolerant quantum computation with superconduting circuits. In this paper, we focus on one- and two-qubit gates that do not require moving away from the charge-degeneracy "sweet spot." This is advantageous as it helps to increase the qubit dephasing time and does not require modification of the original circuit QED. However, these gates can, in some cases, be slower than those that do not use this constraint. Five types of two-qubit gates are discussed, these include gates based on virtual photons, real excitation of the resonator, and a gate based on the geometric phase. We also point out the importance of selection rules when working at the charge degeneracy point.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Aarts E., 1989, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization
  • [2] Polynomial simulations of decohered quantum computers
    Aharonov, D
    BenOr, M
    [J]. 37TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 46 - 55
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1990, PRINCIPLES MAGNETIC, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-09441
  • [4] ELEMENTARY GATES FOR QUANTUM COMPUTATION
    BARENCO, A
    BENNETT, CH
    CLEVE, R
    DIVINCENZO, DP
    MARGOLUS, N
    SHOR, P
    SLEATOR, T
    SMOLIN, JA
    WEINFURTER, H
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1995, 52 (05): : 3457 - 3467
  • [5] Entangled macroscopic quantum states in two superconducting qubits
    Berkley, AJ
    Xu, H
    Ramos, RC
    Gubrud, MA
    Strauch, FW
    Johnson, PR
    Anderson, JR
    Dragt, AJ
    Lobb, CJ
    Wellstood, FC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5625) : 1548 - 1550
  • [6] Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation
    Blais, A
    Huang, RS
    Wallraff, A
    Girvin, SM
    Schoelkopf, RJ
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2004, 69 (06): : 062320 - 1
  • [7] Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits
    Blais, A
    van den Brink, AM
    Zagoskin, AM
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 90 (12) : 4
  • [8] Quantum network optimization
    Blais, A
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 64 (02): : 5
  • [9] Magnetic resonance for nonrotating fields
    Bloch, F
    Siegert, A
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1940, 57 (06): : 522 - 527
  • [10] Quantum coherence with a single Cooper pair
    Bouchiat, V
    Vion, D
    Joyez, P
    Esteve, D
    Devoret, MH
    [J]. PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1998, T76 : 165 - 170