Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures

被引:1
|
作者
Martins, Maira Anelli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Capellini, Simone Aparecida [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Speech & Hearing Sci Dept, UNESP, Campus Univ,Av Hygino Muzzi Filho 737, BR-17525900 Marilia, SP, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, UNESP, Invest Learning Disabil Lab LIDA, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[3] Language Learning Educ CNPq Res Grp, Marilia, SP, Brazil
来源
PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA | 2021年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
Struggling readers; Universal screening; Academic screening; Academic difficulties; Oral reading fluency; Reading research;
D O I
10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students' ORF (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile. Method For this study, a database of readings made available by the Learning Studies Research Laboratory was used. This database consisted of 365 readings by elementary-school students from the third to fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of Sao Paulo from two different public school systems that use the same teaching methodology. The data consisted of digital audio recordings of the passage "The Umbrella" (text suitable for schooling levels) of the Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension procedure. For this procedure, three steps were performed: step 1-listening to the 365 readings and assessing the scores for the number of words read correctly per minute; step 2-the calculation of the mean and percentiles for each grade; and step 3-the adaptation of the reference table to indicate students eligible to receive reading fluency intervention. Results Third-year students who correctly read 86 or more words per minute, fourth-year students who correctly read 104 or more words per minute, and fifth-year students who correctly read 117 or more words per minute were considered students who had made adequate progress in reading. Conclusion It was possible to classify students based on the 1-min fluency measures, with reference intervals of words read correctly per minute per school year (for the third, fourth, and fifth years) for those who were making adequate progress in reading and reference intervals for those who were considered readers who were struggling or at risk of reading difficulties.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
    Maíra Anelli Martins
    Simone Aparecida Capellini
    Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 34
  • [2] One-Minute Fluency Measures: Mixed Messages in Assessment and Instruction
    Deeney, Theresa A.
    READING TEACHER, 2010, 63 (06) : 440 - 450
  • [3] Effects of Fluency Oriented Instruction on Motivation for Reading of Struggling Readers
    Mehigan, Gene
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [4] Psycholinguistic Profiles of Proficient and Struggling Readers in Relation to Reading Fluency
    Safeek, Naina Mohamed Mohamed
    Hock, Kway Eng
    GEMA ONLINE JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2024, 24 (01): : 98 - 113
  • [5] Alternative Text Types to Improve Reading Fluency for Competent to Struggling Readers
    Rasinski, Timothy V.
    Rupley, William H.
    Paige, David D.
    Nichols, William Dee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2016, 9 (01) : 163 - 178
  • [6] The Relationship Between Different Measures of Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension in Second-Grade Students Who Evidence Different Oral Reading Fluency Difficulties
    Wise, Justin C.
    Sevcik, Rose A.
    Morris, Robin D.
    Lovett, Maureen W.
    Wolf, Maryanne
    Kuhn, Melanie
    Meisinger, Beth
    Schwanenflugel, Paula
    LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2010, 41 (03) : 340 - 348
  • [7] Variability in DIBELS Next Progress Monitoring Measures for Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties
    O'Keeffe, Breda V.
    Bundock, Kaitlin
    Kladis, Kristin L.
    Yan, Rui
    Nelson, Kat
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2017, 38 (05) : 272 - 283
  • [8] Impacts of a Teacher-Delivered Reading Intervention on Word-Level Fluency for Early Elementary Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties
    Pedonti, Sarah F.
    Bratsch-Hines, Mary
    Mcintyre, Nancy S.
    Aiken, Heather
    READING & WRITING QUARTERLY, 2025, 41 (03) : 251 - 269