Validation of asthma recording in electronic health records: protocol for a systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Nissen, Francis [1 ]
Quint, Jennifer K. [2 ]
Wilkinson, Samantha [1 ]
Mullerova, Hana [3 ]
Smeeth, Liam [1 ]
Douglas, Ian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Res & Dev Ltd, RWD & Epidemiol, Uxbridge, Middx, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 05期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
asthma; Electronic Health Records; Negative Predictive Value; Positive Predictive Value; sensitivity; specificity; validation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014694
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Asthma is a common, heterogeneous disease with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. It can be difficult to define in epidemiological studies using electronic health records as the diagnosis is based on non-specific respiratory symptoms and spirometry, neither of which are routinely registered. Electronic health records can nonetheless be valuable to study the epidemiology, management, healthcare use and control of asthma. For health databases to be useful sources of information, asthma diagnoses should ideally be validated. The primary objectives are to provide an overview of the methods used to validate asthma diagnoses in electronic health records and summarise the results of the validation studies. Methods EMBASE and MEDLINE will be systematically searched for appropriate search terms. The searches will cover all studies in these databases up to October 2016 with no start date and will yield studies that have validated algorithms or codes for the diagnosis of asthma in electronic health records. At least one test validation measure (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value or other) is necessary for inclusion. In addition, we require the validated algorithms to be compared with an external golden standard, such as a manual review, a questionnaire or an independent second database. We will summarise key data including author, year of publication, country, time period, date, data source, population, case characteristics, clinical events, algorithms, gold standard and validation statistics in a uniform table. Ethics and dissemination This study is a synthesis of previously published studies and, therefore, no ethical approval is required. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Results from this systematic review can be used to study outcome research on asthma and can be used to identify case definitions for asthma. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016041798.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Training medical students and residents in the use of electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature
    Rajaram, Akshay
    Hickey, Zachary
    Patel, Nimesh
    Newbigging, Joseph
    Wolfrom, Brent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (01) : 175 - 180
  • [32] Application of Spatial Analysis on Electronic Health Records to Characterize Patient Phenotypes: Systematic Review
    Mollalo, Abolfazl
    Hamidi, Bashir
    Lenert, Leslie A.
    Alekseyenko, Alexander, V
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12
  • [33] Use of Electronic Health Records by Nurses for Symptom Management in Inpatient Settings A Systematic Review
    Ozkaynak, Mustafa
    Reeder, Blaine
    Hoffecker, Lilian
    Makic, Mary Beth
    Sousa, Karen
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2017, 35 (09) : 465 - 472
  • [34] The identification and validity of congenital malformation diagnoses in UK electronic health records: A systematic review
    Peppa, Maria
    Minassian, Caroline
    Mangtani, Punam
    Thomas, Sara L.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (07) : 875 - 898
  • [36] The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records onHealth Care Engagement: Systematic Review
    Alomar, Dalia
    Almashmoum, Maryam
    Eleftheriou, Iliada
    Whelan, Pauline
    Ainsworth, John
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [37] Defining clinical subtypes of adult asthma using electronic health records: Analysis of a large UK primary care database with external validation
    Horne, Elsie M. F.
    McLean, Susannah
    Alsallakh, Mohammad A.
    Davies, Gwyneth A.
    Price, David B.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Tsanas, Athanasios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 170
  • [38] Identification of Postpartum Depression in Electronic Health Records: Validation in a Large Integrated Health Care System
    Slezak, Jeff
    Sacks, David
    Chiu, Vicki
    Avila, Chantal
    Khadka, Nehaa
    Chen, Jiu-Chiuan
    Wu, Jun
    Getahun, Darios
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 11
  • [39] Recording of weight in electronic health records: an observational study in general practice
    Lisa D. M. Verberne
    Markus M. J. Nielen
    Chantal J. Leemrijse
    Robert A. Verheij
    Roland D. Friele
    BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [40] Pan-Canadian Respiratory Standards Initiative for Electronic Health Records (PRESTINE): Validation of a Severe Asthma Algorithm
    Morra, Alison
    Bullock, Emma
    Tregobov, Noah
    Podgers, Delanya
    Lemiere, Catherine
    Lougheed, M. Diane
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58