Comparison of static and dynamic neural networks for limit cycle oscillation prediction

被引:9
作者
Johnson, MR
Denegri, CM
机构
[1] USAF, SEEK EAGLE Off, Div Anal, Eglin AFB, FL 32542 USA
[2] USAF, Div Engn, Eglin AFB, FL 32542 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2003年 / 40卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2514/2.3075
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A dynamic artificial neural network in the form of a multilayer perceptron with a delayed recurrent feedback connection is investigated to determine its ability to predict linear and nonlinear flutter response characteristics. Flight-test results show that limit cycle oscillation (LCO) response characteristics are strongly dependent on Mach number in the transonic flight regime. This effect is also evident in the classical transonic small-disturbance theory governing equations. A dynamic network is considered in order to examine the effects of sequential Mach-number dependence on the network's predictive capability. The architecture of a dynamic network allows for modeling data dependent on a sequentially or linearly increasing parameter (usually time, but in this case Mach number). The predictive capabilities are compared to those of a static artificial neural network. The network is developed and trained using linear flutter analysis and flight-test results from a fighter test. Eleven external store carriage configurations are used as training data, and three configurations are used as test cases. The dynamic network was successful in predicting the aeroelastic oscillation frequency and amplitude responses over a range of Mach numbers for two of the test cases. The dynamic network showed slightly better correlation to flight-test results for the typical LCO test case but slightly worse correlation for the flutter case. Predictions for the nontypical LCO test case were not good for either network.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   A DOUBLET-LATTICE METHOD FOR CALCULATING LIFT DISTRIBUTIONS ON OSCILLATING SURFACES IN SUBSONIC FLOWS [J].
ALBANO, E ;
RODDEN, WP .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1969, 7 (02) :279-&
[2]   Limit cycle oscillation characteristics of fighter aircraft [J].
Bunton, RW ;
Denegri, CM .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2000, 37 (05) :916-918
[3]  
CHEN PC, 1998, 981727 AIAA
[4]  
CUNNINGHAM AM, 1995, P INT FOR AER STRUCT, V2
[5]   Limit cycle oscillation flight test results of a fighter with external stores [J].
Denegri, CM .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2000, 37 (05) :761-769
[6]   Limit cycle oscillation prediction using artificial neural networks [J].
Denegri, CM ;
Johnson, MR .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2001, 24 (05) :887-895
[7]  
DENEGRI CM, 1997, 971021 AIAA
[8]  
Desmarais R. N., 1974, Journal of Aircraft, V11, P75, DOI 10.2514/3.60326
[9]  
DOWELL EH, 1989, MODRN COURSE AEROELA, P239
[10]  
HAYKIN S, 1994, NEURAL NETWORKS COMP, P138