Feasibility of an iPad to Facilitate Communication in Postoperative Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

被引:9
作者
Brunner, Theresa H. [1 ]
DiFortuna, Kristyn [1 ]
LeTang, Michael [2 ]
Murphy, Jane [1 ]
Stemplewicz, Kara [1 ]
Kovacs, Magda [3 ]
DeRosa, Antonio P. [4 ]
Gibson, Donna S. [4 ]
Ginex, Pamela K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Postanesthesia Care Unit, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Nursing Informat, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Presurg Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Nathan Cummings Ctr, Med Lib, New York, NY USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Nursing Res, New York, NY USA
关键词
communication; technology; augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); mobile device; postoperative; patient satisfaction;
D O I
10.1016/j.jopan.2016.10.008
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To measure the feasibility of a communication application and an iPad to facilitate communication in postoperative patients with head and neck cancer. Design: A prospective feasibility study. Methods: This IRB-approved study was conducted in the postanesthesia care unit at an urban comprehensive cancer center. The participants included patients with head and neck cancer who underwent surgery that resulted in altered communication. Questionnaires were developed and administered to measure feasibility and patient satisfaction at different time points (preoperative, postoperative, and 1 to 4 days postoperatively). Findings: Of 38 patients in the study, 25 (66%) were able to use the customized iPad. Of these 25 patients, 15 (60%) were satisfied or somewhat satisfied with it. 84% found the customized iPad to be very or somewhat helpful for communication after surgery. Conclusions: Patients were satisfied with the customized iPad, and the study found that using technology such as this was feasible in the immediate postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 406
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Costello J., 2000, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, V16, P137, DOI [10.1080/07434610012331279004, DOI 10.1080/07434610012331279004]
[2]   A Comparison of Communication Using the Apple iPad and a Picture-based System [J].
Flores, Margaret ;
Musgrove, Kate ;
Renner, Scott ;
Hinton, Vanessa ;
Strozier, Shaunita ;
Franklin, Susan ;
Hil, Doris .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2012, 28 (02) :74-84
[3]  
Happ MB, 2004, CANCER NURS, V27, P1
[4]  
MacAulay F., 2002, ASSETS 2002. Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies, P226, DOI 10.1145/638249.638290
[5]  
McGonigle D., 2014, Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge
[6]   Factors related to the emotional responses of intubated patients to being unable to speak [J].
Menzel, LK .
HEART & LUNG, 1998, 27 (04) :245-252
[7]   Computer-assisted communication for critically ill patients: A pilot study [J].
Miglietta, MA ;
Bochicchio, G ;
Scalea, TM .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 57 (03) :488-493
[8]   Use of a Speech-Generating Device for Hospitalized Postoperative Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Experiencing Speechlessness [J].
Rodriguez, Carmen ;
Rowe, Meredeth .
ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2010, 37 (02) :199-205
[9]   ENHANCING THE COMMUNICATION OF SUDDENLY SPEECHLESS CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS [J].
Rodriguez, Carmen S. ;
Rowe, Meredeth ;
Thomas, Loris ;
Shuster, Jonathan ;
Koeppel, Brent ;
Cairns, Paula .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 25 (03) :E40-E47
[10]  
Ventola C Lee, 2014, P T, V39, P356