Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty: a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty

被引:16
作者
Kolethekkat, A. A. [1 ]
Al Abri, R. [1 ]
Al Zaabi, K. [2 ]
Al Marhoobi, N. [2 ]
Jose, S. [3 ]
Pillai, S. [1 ]
Mathew, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ Hosp, ENT Div, Dept Surg, PC 123,POB 38, Al Khoud, Oman
[2] Oman Med Specialty Board, ENT Specialty, Muscat, Oman
[3] Oman Med Specialty Board, Dept Stat, Muscat, Oman
关键词
Cartilage; Fascia; Tympanoplasty; RETRACTION POCKETS; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE; RECONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; MYRINGOPLASTY; PERICHONDRIUM; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215118000762
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. To validate a newly introduced cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty technique by statistically comparing it with the morphological and audiological outcomes of traditional temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Methods. A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent tympanoplasty during 2013 and 2015. Fifty-eight patients underwent temporalis fascia tympanoplasty and 57 underwent cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty. Results. In the cartilage fascia group, graft healing was achieved in 94.7 per cent of cases; in the temporalis fascia group, the graft take-up rate was 70 per cent. In those with a normal ossicular chain, the post-operative air-bone gap was within 20 dB in 92.6 per cent of cartilage fascia group cases and in 69.7 per cent of the temporalis fascia group cases, which was a statistically significant difference. Among the defective ossicular chain cases, the post-operative air-bone gap was within 20 dB in 76.9 per cent in the cartilage fascia group, as against 57.1 per cent in the temporalis fascia group. Conclusion. Cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty has a definite advantage over the temporalis fascia technique in terms of superior graft take up and statistically significant hearing gain in those with normal ossicular mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Cartilage shield tympanoplasty: A reliable technique [J].
Aidonis, I ;
Robertson, TC ;
Sismanis, A .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) :838-841
[2]  
Albirmawy O A, 2010, J Laryngol Otol, V124, P967, DOI 10.1017/S0022215110000885
[3]   Island cartilage myringoplasty. Anatomical and functional results in 122 cases [J].
Altuna, Xabier ;
Jose Navarro, Juan ;
Martinez, Zurine ;
Lobato, Rocio ;
Algaba, Jesus .
ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 2010, 61 (02) :100-105
[4]  
AMEDEE RG, 1989, AM J OTOL, V10, P447
[5]   Telemedicine-Assisted Neurotology in Post-Katrina Southeast Louisiana [J].
Arriaga, Moises A. ;
Nuss, Daniel ;
Scrantz, Kelly ;
Arriaga, Lydia ;
Montgomery, Elizabeth ;
St John, Patti ;
Sharbaugh, Elona ;
Whittle, Deanna .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (03) :524-527
[6]   Efficacy of Cartilage Palisade Tympanoplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Cabra, Jesus ;
Monux, Alfonso .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (04) :589-595
[7]   Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children [J].
Couloigner, V ;
Bacúlard, F ;
El Bakkouri, W ;
Viala, P ;
François, M ;
Narcy, P ;
Van Den Abbeele, T .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (02) :247-251
[8]   Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty [J].
Demirpehlivan, Inci Alkan ;
Onal, Kazim ;
Arslanoglu, Secil ;
Songu, Murat ;
Ciger, Ejder ;
Can, Nazan .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 268 (03) :471-474
[9]   Cartilage tympanoplasty: Indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000 patient series [J].
Dornhoffer, J .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2003, 113 (11) :1844-1856
[10]   Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty [J].
Dornhoffer, JL .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (08) :1094-1099