Spatiotemporal Variation in Ecosystem Services and Their Drivers among Different Landscape Heterogeneity Units and Terrain Gradients in the Southern Hill and Mountain Belt, China

被引:40
作者
Wang, Liang-Jie [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Shuai [1 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ]
Zhao, Yu-Guo [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jin-Chi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Soil Eros & Ecol Restorat, Coinnovat Ctr Sustainable Forestry Southern China, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, State Key Lab Soil & Sustainable Agr, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecosystem services; spatial heterogeneity; mountainous region; influencing factors; ecosystem management;
D O I
10.3390/rs13071375
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services (ESs) and their drivers in mountainous areas is important for sustainable ecosystem management. However, the effective construction of landscape heterogeneous units (LHUs) to reflect the spatial characteristics of ESs remains to be studied. The southern hill and mountain belt (SHMB) is a typical mountainous region in China, with undulating terrain and obvious spatial heterogeneity of ESs, and was selected as the study area. In this study, we used the fuzzy k-means (FKM) algorithm to establish LHUs. Three major ESs (water yield, net primary productivity (NPP), and soil conservation) in 2000 and 2015 were quantified using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model and Carnegie Ames-Stanford approach (CASA) model. Then, we explored the spatial variation in ESs along terrain gradients and LHUs. Correlation analysis was used to analyze the driving factors of ESs in each terrain region and LHU. The results showed that altitude and terrain niche increased along LHUs. Water yield and soil conservation increased from 696.86 mm and 3920.19 t/km(2) to 1061.12 mm and 5117.90 t/km(2), respectively, while NPP decreased from 666.95 gC/m(2) to 648.86 gC/m(2). The ESs in different LHUs differed greatly. ESs increased first and then decreased along LHUs in 2000. In 2015, water yield decreased along LHUs, while NPP and soil conservation showed a fluctuating trend. Water yield was mainly affected by precipitation, temperature and NDVI were the main drivers of NPP, and soil conservation was greatly affected by precipitation and slope. The driving factors of the same ES were different in different terrain areas and LHUs. The variation and driving factors of ESs in LHUs were similar to some terrain gradients. To some extent, LHUs can represent multiple terrain features. This study can provide important support for mountain ecosystem zoning management and decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Land-Use Change and its Effects in Charchan Oasis, Xinjiang, China
    Abulizi, Abudukeyimu
    Yang, Yongguo
    Mamat, Zulpiya
    Luo, Jinhui
    Abdulslam, Dilshat
    Xu, Zhonglin
    Zayiti, Abudoukeremujiang
    Ahat, Abdulkeyum
    Halik, Wahap
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (01) : 106 - 115
  • [2] Scale effects on the relationships between land characteristics and ecosystem services- a case study in Taihu Lake Basin, China
    Bai, Yang
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Alatalod, Juha M.
    Yang, Zhangqian
    Jiang, Bo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 716
  • [3] Mapping Trade-Offs in Ecosystem Services from Reforestation in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
    Barnett, Analie
    Fargione, Joseph
    Smith, Mark P.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2016, 66 (03) : 223 - 237
  • [4] Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Gordon, Line J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) : 1394 - 1404
  • [5] Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Cabello, Javier
    Vaughn, Caryn C.
    Lopez, Enrique
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 132 : 102 - 110
  • [6] Conservation agriculture as a promising trade-off between conventional and organic agriculture in bundling ecosystem services
    Chabert, Ariane
    Sarthou, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 292
  • [7] Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas
    Chen, Tianqian
    Feng, Zhe
    Zhao, Huafu
    Wu, Kening
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 711
  • [8] Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?
    Costanza, Robert
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Braat, Leon
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Fioramonti, Lorenzo
    Sutton, Paul
    Farber, Steve
    Grasso, Monica
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 1 - 16
  • [9] Changes in the global value of ecosystem services
    Costanza, Robert
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Sutton, Paul
    van der Ploeg, Sander
    Anderson, Sharolyn J.
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Farber, Stephen
    Turner, R. Kerry
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 26 : 152 - 158
  • [10] Multiscale delineation of landscape planning units based on spatial variation of land-use patterns in Galicia, NW Spain
    Diaz-Varela, Emilio
    Jose Alvarez-Lopez, Carlos
    Francisco Marey-Perez, Manuel
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 5 (01) : 1 - 10