Life-cycle assessment of two potable water reuse technologies: MF/RO/UV-AOP treatment and hybrid osmotic membrane bioreactors

被引:87
作者
Holloway, Ryan W. [1 ]
Miller-Robbie, Leslie [1 ]
Patel, Mehul [2 ]
Stokes, Jennifer R. [3 ]
Munakata-Marr, Junko [1 ]
Dadakis, Jason [2 ]
Cath, Tzahi Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Orange Cty Water Dist, Fountain Valley, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Water reuse; Potable reuse; Forward osmosis; Reverse osmosis; Osmotic membrane bioreactor; TRACE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS; MUNICIPAL WASTE-WATER; SEAWATER DESALINATION; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; FLUX BEHAVIOR; OSMOSIS; REMOVAL; ENERGY; SYSTEM; ULTRAFILTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.045
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment tool and methodology were used to study two potable reuse treatment schemes: a full-advanced treatment (FAT) approach and a hybrid ultrafiltration osmotic membrane bioreactor (UFO-MBR). FAT combines conventional wastewater treatment followed by low-pressure membrane filtration, reverse osmosis (RO), and ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOP). The UFO-MBR couples biological treatment processes with forward osmosis (FO) membranes and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes in one integrated system. RO is coupled with FO in the UFO-MBR process to produce ultra pure water and a reconcentrated draw solution (DS) for reuse in the FO process. Construction material, energy demand, and chemical use data were collected and calculated to determine the energy use and a subset of environmental impacts of each system. Results from the LCA illustrate that the energy use and environmental impacts of FAT are lower than those of UFO-MBR treatment. The higher impacts of UFO-MBR treatment were associated with the required large area of the FO membrane and high RO energy use. UFO-MBR treatment was further assessed using higher permeability FO membranes and RO energy recovery. Following simulation of process optimization, the environmental impacts of UFO-MBR were brought much closer to those of FAT. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 178
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes
    Achilli, Andrea
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Marchand, Eric A.
    Childress, Amy E.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 239 (1-3) : 10 - 21
  • [2] Allgeier S., 2005, Membrane filtration guidance manual
  • [3] Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: Flux stability and removal of trace organics
    Alturki, Abdulhakeem
    McDonald, James
    Khan, Stuart J.
    Hai, Faisal I.
    Price, William E.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 113 : 201 - 206
  • [4] Removal of trace organic contaminants by the forward osmosis process
    Alturki, Abdulhakeem Ali
    McDonald, James A.
    Khan, Stuart J.
    Price, William E.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 103 : 258 - 266
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, ELECT USE MANAGEMENT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, WAT PLAN UPD 2005
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, ROSA system design software
  • [9] Appelbaum B., 2002, Water and Sustainability: U.S. Electricity Consumption for Water Supply Treatment - The Next Half Century
  • [10] Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study
    Arevalo, Juan
    Garralon, Gloria
    Plaza, Fidel
    Moreno, Begona
    Perez, Jorge
    Angel Gomez, Miguel
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 243 (1-3) : 32 - 41