Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas

被引:141
作者
Zafra-Calvo, N. [1 ,2 ]
Pascual, U. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brockington, D. [5 ]
Coolsaet, B. [6 ]
Cortes-Vazquez, J. A. [5 ]
Gross-Camp, N. [6 ]
Palomo, I. [2 ,7 ]
Burgess, N. D. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Univ Pk 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] BC3, Edificio Sede 1,Planta 1a,Parque Cient UPV EHU, Leioa 48940, Bizkaia, Spain
[3] Basque Sci Fdn, Ikerbasque, Maria Diaz de Haro 3, Bilbao 48013, Spain
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England
[5] Univ Sheffield, SIID, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[7] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, C Darwin,2,Edificio Biol, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[8] UNEP World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, 219 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Aichi target 11; Distribution; Procedure; PAs managers; Recognition; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; IMPACTS; PERCEPTIONS; JUSTICE; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVES; PAYMENTS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.014
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aichi Target 11 (AT11), adopted by 193 Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 2010, states that protected areas (PAs) must be equitably managed by 2020. However, significant challenges remain in terms of actual implementation of equitable management in PAs. These challenges include, among others, the lack of a standardized approach to assess and monitor social equity and the difficulty of reducing social equity to a series of metrics. This perspective addresses these challenges and it proposes a minimum set of ten indicators for assessing and monitoring the three dimensions of social equity in protected areas: recognition, procedure and distribution. The indicators target information on social equity regarding cultural identity, statutory and customary rights, knowledge diversity; free, prior and informed consent mechanisms, full participation and transparency in decision-making, access to justice, accountability over decisions, distribution of conservation burdens, and sharing of conservation benefits. The proposed indicator system is a first step in advancing an approach to facilitate our understanding of how the different dimensions of social equity are denied or recognized in PAs globally. The proposed system would be used by practitioners to mainstream social equity indicators in PM assessments at the site level and to report to the CBD on the 'equitably managed' element of AT11.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Conservation practitioners' perspectives on decision triggers for evidence-based management [J].
Addison, Prue F. E. ;
Cook, Carly N. ;
de Bie, Kelly .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 53 (05) :1351-1357
[2]   Gender and Attitudes toward Protected Areas in Myanmar [J].
Allendorf, Teri D. ;
Allendorf, Keera .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (08) :962-976
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PARKS, DOI DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.PARKS-22-1BPS.EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Conservation and Society, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.1098410
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BEST PRACT PROTECT A
[6]  
[Anonymous], CURR SOCIOL
[7]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[8]   A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Mills, Morena ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Hicks, Christina C. ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Stoeckl, Natalie ;
Bottrill, Madeleine C. ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Chan, Kai M. A. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (04) :194-202
[9]   Protect biodiversity, not just area [J].
Barnes, Megan .
NATURE, 2015, 526 (7572) :195-195
[10]  
Bauler T., 2007, Sustainability Indicators, A scientific Assessment