Experimental evaluation of a glass curtain wall of a tall building

被引:32
作者
Lu, Wensheng [1 ]
Huang, Baofeng [1 ]
Mosalam, Khalid M. [2 ]
Chen, Shiming [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 723 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
floor acceleration amplification; glass curtain walls; seismic performance; shaking table test; story drift; tall buildings; FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMANDS; SEISMIC DESIGN FORCES; MULTISTORY BUILDINGS; RACKING TESTS; PERFORMANCE; INPLANE;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.2705
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The seismic demand parameters including the floor acceleration amplification (FAA) factors and the interstory drift ratios (IDRs) were acquired from the floor response in time history analysis of a tall building subjected to selected ground motions. The FAA factors determined in this way are larger than those given in most current code provisions, but the obtained IDRs are close to the values given in some code provisions. Imposing a series of in-plane pre-deformations to two glass curtain wall (CW) specimens mounted on a shaking table, the IDRs were reproduced and the FAA factors were satisfied through applications of computed floor spectra compatible motion time histories, whose peak accelerations corresponded to the FAA factors. The CW specimens performed well during the whole experimental program with almost no change in the fundamental frequencies. No visible damage was observed in the glass panels. The maximum stresses detected in each component of the CW system were smaller than the design strengths. The obtained component acceleration amplification factor approached 3.35, which is larger than the value given in the current code provisions. In conclusion, the performance of the studied CW system is seismically safe. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1205
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
American Architectural Manufacture Association, 2009, REC DYN TEST METH DE
[2]  
American Architectural Manufacture Association, 2009, REC STAT TEST METH E
[3]  
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010, 710 ASCESEI AM SOC C
[4]  
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006, ASCE SEI 7 05 MIN DE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COD SEISM DES BUILD
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FEMA 461
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STRUCT DES ACT 5
[9]  
Architectural institute of japan (AIJ), 2003, DES GUID EARTHQ RES
[10]   Facade damage assessment of concrete buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake [J].
Baird, Andrew ;
Palermo, Alessandro ;
Pampanin, Stefano .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2012, 13 (01) :3-13