Enalapril in RAPIDISC (wafer formulation): pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel, convenient formulation

被引:0
作者
Lo, MW
McCrea, JB
Shadle, CR
Hesney, M
Chiou, R
Cylc, D
Yuan, AS
Goldberg, MR
机构
[1] Merck Res Labs, Clin Pharmacol, West Point, PA 19486 USA
[2] Merck Res Labs, Drug Metab, West Point, PA 19486 USA
[3] Merck Res Labs, Clin Biostat, West Point, PA 19486 USA
关键词
bioequivalence; enalapril; pharmacokinetics; drug formulation; compliance; hypertension; heart failure; urinary; excretion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Enalapril in RAPIDISC* (wafer), a new easy-to-administer formulation of enalapril, may improve the convenience of enalapril therapy, thereby helping patients adhere to antihypertensive treatment. Subjects and methods: To determine whether 20 mg enalapril wafer is bioequivalent to the conventional 20 mg enalapril tablet, an open-label, two-period crossover study was performed in 16 healthy male volunteers. Cumulative urinary recovery of free enalaprilat (active metabolite of enalapril) and the serum maximum concentration of free enalaprilat (C-max,,) were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters used to determine bioequivalence in this study. Bioequivalence was defined as the geometric mean ratio (wafer : tablet) falling within the equivalence limits of 0.80 to 1.25 for both parameters. Results: Cumulative urinary recovery of free enalaprilat (0 - 72 hours) was similar between the wafer and conventional tablet formulations (arithmetic mean 5.13 vs. 5.03 mg, about 36% of dose). The geometric mean ratio of the urinary recovery of free enalaprilat (wafer: tablet) was 1.03 (90% CI: 0.93, 1.15). C-max of serum enalaprilat was also similar between the wafer and conventional tablet formulations (arithmetic mean 85.7 vs. 76.3 ng/ml). The geometric mean C-max ratio (wafer : tablet) was 1.10(90% CI: 1.00, 1.22). Both enalapril formulations were well tolerated. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 20 mg enalapril in RAPIDISC is bioequivalent to 20 mg enalapril conventional tablet.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 332
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN O, 1995, NORWEGIAN J MED, V115, P947
[2]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF LISINOPRIL (IV/PO) IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS [J].
BEERMANN, B ;
TILL, AE ;
GOMEZ, HJ ;
HICHENS, M ;
BOLOGNESE, JA ;
JUNGGREN, IL .
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1989, 10 (04) :397-409
[3]  
CHOW SC, 1992, DESIGN ANAL BIOAVAIL, P154
[4]   A COMPARISON OF ENALAPRIL WITH HYDRALAZINE ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE [J].
COHN, JN ;
JOHNSON, G ;
ZIESCHE, S ;
COBB, F ;
FRANCIS, G ;
TRISTANI, F ;
SMITH, R ;
DUNKMAN, WB ;
LOEB, H ;
WONG, ML ;
BHAT, G ;
GOLDMAN, S ;
FLETCHER, RD ;
DOHERTY, J ;
HUGHES, CV ;
CARSON, P ;
CINTRON, G ;
SHABETAI, R ;
HAAKENSON, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (05) :303-310
[5]   REVERSAL OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS - A METAANALYSIS OF 109 TREATMENT STUDIES [J].
DAHLOF, B ;
PENNERT, K ;
HANSSON, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1992, 5 (02) :95-110
[6]  
DAVIS M, 1998, PRESCRIBER S, V2, P1
[7]  
DUNBAR-JACOB J, 1991, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, V13, P31
[8]  
Haynes R., 1976, Compliance with therapeutic regimens, chapter A critical review of "determinants" of patient compliance with therapeutic regimens, P26
[9]   ENALAPRIL, ATENOLOL, AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION - A COMPARATIVE MULTICENTER STUDY IN GENERAL-PRACTICE IN NORWAY [J].
HELGELAND, A ;
HAGELUND, CH ;
STROMMEN, R ;
TRETLI, S .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8486) :872-875
[10]  
HICHENS M, 1981, Ligand Quarterly, V4, P43