Non-prismatic beams: A simple and effective Timoshenko-like model

被引:63
作者
Balduzzi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Aminbaghai, Mehdi [2 ]
Sacco, Elio [3 ]
Fussl, Josef [2 ]
Eberhardsteiner, Josef [2 ]
Auricchio, Ferdinando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dept Civil Engn & Architeture DICAr, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Mech Mat & Struct IMWS, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Cassino & Southern Lazio, Dept Civil & Mech Engn, Cassino, Italy
关键词
Non-prismatic Timoshenko beam; Beam modeling; Analytical solution; Tapered beam; Arches; VARIABLE CROSS-SECTION; STIFFNESS MATRIX; COMPOSITE BEAMS; INPLANE DEFORMATION; ELEMENT; FORMULATION; MEMBERS; FRAMES; RANGE; STRIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.017
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The present paper discusses simple compatibility, equilibrium, and constitutive equations for a non prismatic planar beam. Specifically, the proposed model is based on standard Timoshenko kinematics (i.e., planar cross-section remain planar in consequence of a deformation, but can rotate with respect to the beam center-line). An initial discussion of a 2D elastic problem highlights that the boundary equilibrium deeply influences the cross-section stress distribution and all unknown fields are represented with respect to global Cartesian coordinates. A simple beam model (i.e. a set of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs)) is derived, describing accurately the effects of non-prismatic geometry on the beam behavior and motivating equation's terms with both physical and mathematical arguments. Finally, several analytical and numerical solutions are compared with results existing in literature. The main conclusions can be summarized as follows. (i) The stress distribution within the cross-section is not trivial as in prismatic beams, in particular the shear stress distribution depends on all generalized stresses and on the beam geometry. (ii) The derivation of simplified constitutive relations highlights a strong dependence of each generalized deformation on all the generalized stresses. (iii) Axial and shear-bending problems are strictly coupled. (iv) The beam model is naturally expressed as an explicit system of six first order ODEs. (v) The ODEs solution can be obtained through the iterative integration of the right hand side term of each equation. (vi) The proposed simple model predicts the real behavior of non-prismatic beams with a good accuracy, reasonable for the most of practical applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 250
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [11] Stiffness formulation for nonprismatic beam elements - Discussion
    Balkaya, C
    Citipitioglu, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (12): : 1694 - 1694
  • [12] Behavior and modeling of nonprismatic members having T-sections
    Balkaya, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2001, 127 (08): : 940 - 946
  • [13] EXACT BERNOULLI-EULER DYNAMIC STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR A RANGE OF TAPERED BEAMS
    BANERJEE, JR
    WILLIAMS, FW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1985, 21 (12) : 2289 - 2302
  • [14] EXACT BERNOULLI-EULER STATIC STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR A RANGE OF TAPERED BEAM-COLUMNS
    BANERJEE, JR
    WILLIAMS, FW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1986, 23 (09) : 1615 - 1628
  • [15] Beltempo A., 2013, THESIS U PAVIA
  • [16] Analytical derivation of a general 2D non-prismatic beam model based on the Hellinger-Reissner principle
    Beltempo, Angela
    Balduzzi, Giuseppe
    Alfano, Giulio
    Auricchio, Ferdinando
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 101 : 88 - 98
  • [17] Boley B. A., 1963, J APPL MECH, V30, P374
  • [18] LINEAR-ANALYSIS OF NATURALLY CURVED AND TWISTED ANISOTROPIC BEAMS
    BORRI, M
    GHIRINGHELLI, GL
    MERLINI, T
    [J]. COMPOSITES ENGINEERING, 1992, 2 (5-7): : 433 - 456
  • [19] Bruhns O.T., 2003, Advanced Mechanics of Solids
  • [20] Capurso M., 1971, LEZIONI SCI COSTRUZI