Innovation and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms

被引:226
作者
Griffin, Andrea S. [1 ]
Guez, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
Behavioural flexibility; Cognition; Innovation; Problem solving; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; CALEDONIAN CROWS; EXPLORATORY-BEHAVIOR; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; LARGER GROUPS; SOCIAL RANK; BRAIN SIZE; TOOL USE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Behavioural innovations have become central to our thinking about how animals adjust to changing environments. It is now well established that animals vary in their ability to innovate, but understanding why remains a challenge. This is because innovations are rare, so studying innovation requires alternative experimental assays that create opportunities for animals to express their ability to invent new behaviours, or use pre-existing ones in new contexts. Problem solving of extractive foraging tasks has been put forward as a suitable experimental assay. We review the rapidly expanding literature on problem solving of extractive foraging tasks in order to better understand to what extent the processes underpinning problem solving, and the factors influencing problem solving, are in line with those predicted, and found, to underpin and influence innovation in the wild. Our aim is to determine whether problem solving can be used as an experimental proxy of innovation. We find that in most respects, problem solving is determined by the same underpinning mechanisms, and is influenced by the same factors, as those predicted to underpin, and to influence, innovation. We conclude that problem solving is a valid experimental assay for studying innovation, propose a conceptual model of problem solving in which motor diversity plays a more central role than has been considered to date, and provide recommendations for future research using problem solving to investigate innovation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Cognition in the wild. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 134
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [11] Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia)
    Bouchard, Julie
    Goodyer, William
    Lefebvre, Louis
    [J]. ANIMAL COGNITION, 2007, 10 (02) : 259 - 266
  • [12] PRIMATE COGNITION - COMPARING PROBLEMS AND SKILLS
    BYRNE, RW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1995, 37 (02) : 127 - 141
  • [13] How not to measure boldness: novel object and antipredator responses are not the same in wild baboons
    Carter, Alecia J.
    Marshall, Harry H.
    Heinsohn, Robert
    Cowlishaw, Guy
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 84 (03) : 603 - 609
  • [14] Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population
    Cauchard, Laure
    Boogert, Neeltje J.
    Lefebvre, Louis
    Dubois, Frederique
    Doligez, Blandine
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 85 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [15] TEMPERAMENT IN NONHUMAN-PRIMATES
    CLARKE, AS
    BOINSKI, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1995, 37 (02) : 103 - 125
  • [16] Animal innovation
    Clayton, NS
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (03) : 98 - 99
  • [17] Extraordinary large brains in tool-using New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides)
    Cnotka, Julia
    Guentuerkuen, Onur
    Rehkaemper, Gerd
    Gray, Russell D.
    Hunt, Gavin R.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2008, 433 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [18] Cognitive Ability Influences Reproductive Life History Variation in the Wild
    Cole, Ella F.
    Morand-Ferron, Julie
    Hinks, Amy E.
    Quinn, John L.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (19) : 1808 - 1812
  • [19] Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild
    Cole, Ella F.
    Quinn, John L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 279 (1731) : 1168 - 1175
  • [20] Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits
    Cole, Ella F.
    Cram, Dominic L.
    Quinn, John L.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2011, 81 (02) : 491 - 498