The Role of Agency Partnerships in Collaborative Watershed Groups: Lessons from the Pacific Northwest Experience

被引:11
作者
Chaffin, Brian C. [1 ]
Mahler, Robert L. [2 ]
Wulfhorst, J. D. [3 ]
Shafii, Bahman [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Plant Soil & Entomol Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Stat Programs, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
关键词
Collaborative watershed groups; Watershed management; Watershed planning; Agency partnerships; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; POLICY; STATES;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-014-0367-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Collaborative watershed group experiences reveal commonalities in their approaches to facilitate decentralized and inclusive watershed planning and management in the United States, and increasingly around the world. Although watershed groups are widely recognized in the United States for positive accomplishments across local, state, and regional scales, the role of government agencies as watershed group partners often remains ambiguous and inconsistent. This paper details results of a survey used to determine the status of Pacific Northwest (PNW) watershed group-agency partnerships relative to planning and management. Specific inquiry was directed toward: (1) the role of technical information flow; and (2) watershed group needs. Mail surveys were administered to 304 watershed group participants in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Sixty-nine percent of the surveys were completed and returned. Based on the collected survey data, PNW watershed groups rely heavily on agency officials for technical watershed information. Respondents perceive support of state government to be the highest relative to federal agencies, local governments, and university Extension offices. However, evidence from the survey suggests that partnerships are underutilized across all agencies and organizations concurrently vested in watershed planning and management in the PNW. Sustained operational funding, increased group participation, and baseline watershed data are the most pressing needs of PNW watershed groups and present a significant opportunity for expanding watershed group-agency partnerships.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Allen W., 2005, FARMERS DECISION, P45
[2]  
Barham E, 2001, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V14, P181, DOI 10.1080/08941920119376
[3]   Collaborative environmental governance: Are watershed partnerships swimming or are they sinking? [J].
Benson, David ;
Jordan, Andrew ;
Cook, Hadrian ;
Smith, Laurence .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) :748-757
[4]  
Berg B., 2011, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, V8th
[5]   Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships [J].
Bidwell, Ryan D. ;
Ryan, Clare M. .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2006, 19 (09) :827-843
[6]   Stumbling forward: The organizational challenges of building and sustaining collaborative watershed management [J].
Bonnell, Joseph E. ;
Koontz, Tomas M. .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2007, 20 (02) :153-167
[7]   Stakeholder Analysis of a Collaborative Watershed Management Process: A Florida Case Study [J].
Borisova, Tatiana ;
Racevskis, Laila ;
Kipp, Jennison .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2012, 48 (02) :277-296
[8]   When stakeholders choose: Process, knowledge, and motivation in water quality decisions [J].
Burroughs, R .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1999, 12 (08) :797-809
[9]   Managing public forests: Understanding the role of collaborative planning [J].
Carr, DS ;
Selin, SW ;
Schuett, MA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 22 (05) :767-776
[10]   Collaborative Watershed Groups in Three Pacific Northwest States: A Regional Evaluation of Group Metrics and Perceived Success [J].
Chaffin, B. C. ;
Mahler, R. L. ;
Wulfhorst, J. D. ;
Shafii, B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2012, 48 (01) :113-122