Transition and transformation: A review of the concept of change in the progress towards future sustainable energy systems

被引:50
作者
Child, Michael [1 ]
Breyer, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Skinnarilankatu 34, Lappeenranta 53850, Finland
关键词
Energy system change; Transition; Transformation; Multi-level perspective; Socio-technical system; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; HYDROGEN TRANSITIONS; POLICY CHOICES; PUBLIC VALUES; POWER-SYSTEM; SCENARIOS; TECHNOLOGY; PATHWAYS; GERMAN; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It seems generally accepted that change will occur in global energy systems. There also appears to be consensus on the kinds of changes that may possible for the future, even though there may be disagreement over the exact mix of technologies and policies needed to increase sustainability or mitigate climate change. The terms transition and transformation have both been used to denote the type of change needed in large socio-technical systems. However, the terms have been used both in contradiction of each other and synonymously by different authors. A comprehensive review of both theory and usage in scientific publications was conducted to determine if the terms have been used to denote fundamentally different concepts and if the concept of change is framed differently by usage so as to affect understanding. Despite two camps being readily identifiable, it was concluded that the terms generally refer to the same fundamental concept. At the same time, framing of the concept can be viewed as somewhat different, resulting in a potential for confusion on the part of the reader that may detract from achieving the outcome of change. It is suggested that change to physical forms and systems be denoted as transformations, and that changes to large socio-technical systems be denoted as transitions when the focus is on a higher order of change that highlights the ways that society motivates, facilitates, and benefits from change.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 26
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Energy sustainability, stakeholder conflicts, and the future of hydrogen in Denmark [J].
Andreasen, Kristian Peter ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :891-897
[2]   Crossroads in the past 23years history of the Romanian energy system [J].
Badileanu, Marina .
1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 'ECONOMIC SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH - THEORETICAL, EMPIRICAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES', ESPERA 2013, 2014, 8 :60-65
[3]   Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies [J].
Bertram, Christoph ;
Johnson, Nils ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Riahi, Keyvvan ;
Isaac, Morna ;
Eom, Jiyong .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 :62-72
[4]  
Boulding KennethE., 1964, The Meaning of the Twentieth Century: The Great Transition
[5]   Public values for energy futures: Framing, indeterminacy and policy making [J].
Butler, C. ;
Demski, C. ;
Parkhill, K. ;
Pidgeon, N. ;
Spence, A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 87 :665-672
[6]  
Cambridge University Press, CAMBR DICT ONL
[7]   European decarbonisation pathways under alternative technological and policy choices: A multi-model analysis [J].
Capros, Pantelis ;
Paroussos, Leonidas ;
Fragkos, Panagiotis ;
Tsani, Stella ;
Boitier, Baptiste ;
Wagner, Fabian ;
Busch, Sebastian ;
Resch, Gustav ;
Blesl, Markus ;
Bollen, Johannes .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2014, 2 (3-4) :231-245
[8]   Technologies and policies for the transition to a sustainable energy system in china [J].
Chai, Qimin ;
Zhang, Xiliang .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) :3995-4002
[9]   Transition and transformation: A bibliometric analysis of two scientific networks researching socio-technical change [J].
Chappin, Emile J. L. ;
Ligtvoet, Andreas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 30 :715-723
[10]   Importance of policy for energy system transformation: Diffusion of PV technology in Japan and Germany [J].
Chowdhury, Sanjeeda ;
Sumita, Ushio ;
Islam, Ashraful ;
Bedja, Idriss .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :285-293