The evolution of the biofuel science

被引:57
作者
Azadi, Pooya [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Malina, Robert [1 ,3 ]
Barrett, Steven R. H. [1 ]
Kraft, Markus [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Lab Aviat & Environm, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, New Museums Site,Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3RA, England
[3] Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
[4] Stanford Univ, Freeman Spogli Inst Int Studies, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Biofuels; Biomass; Research and development; Data mining; Scientometric analysis; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.181
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to their potential role in addressing the challenges of energy and environment, biofuels have been receiving significant attention from scientists in various disciplines and countries. Over the past few decades, the biofuel science has undergone major changes with regard to its rate of development, focus, and the contributing countries. We put the evolution the biofuel science into context by analyzing 49,000 relevant papers (comprising 0.26% of all publications across physical and life sciences) published between 1990 and 2014. We first determine the scientific contributions of different countries to the science on biofuels, and then analyze how the R & D expenditure and biomass availability is associated with their outputs. Subsequently, the structure of biofuel science in terms of the links between biomass feedstocks and final products are quantitatively discussed. We find that 28%, 16%, and 15% of all papers considered are published by researchers from the EU, China, and USA, respectively. Denmark, Sweden, and Finland have the highest number of biofuel-related publications per capita (i.e. 133, 113, and 103 papers per million capita and annum, respectively). The percentage share of studies on edible, lignocellulosic, and algal biomass are 46%, 40%, and 14%, respectively. Fermentation, hydrolysis, and esterification are the most widely studied conversion pathways, while liquefaction and life cycle assessment are the most cited subfields. Finally, using United States' statistics, it is shown that upon accounting for the time delay between the nominal budget release year and the calendar year in which corresponding papers would ultimately appear in print, the publication trend was closely correlated to the R & D expenditure (r=0.98).
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1484
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels [J].
Alonso, David Martin ;
Bond, Jesse Q. ;
Dumesic, James A. .
GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2010, 12 (09) :1493-1513
[2]   Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways [J].
Anex, Robert P. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua ;
Swanson, Ryan M. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Satrio, Justinus A. ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Daugaard, Daren E. ;
Platon, Alex ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Dutta, Abhijit .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S29-S35
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, BIOFUELS OECD FAO AG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, US BILL TON UPD BIOM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TIGHT OIL PROD PUSH
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Annual energy outlook
[7]  
[Anonymous], REN STAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STAT HDB CAN UPSTR I
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, World Energy Outlook 2014
[10]   Simulation and life cycle assessment of algae gasification process in dual fluidized bed gasifiers [J].
Azadi, Pooya ;
Brownbridge, George ;
Mosbach, Sebastian ;
Inderwildi, Oliver ;
Kraft, Markus .
GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 17 (03) :1793-1801