Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) under thermophilic condition: Optimal ratio for biochemical methane production

被引:4
作者
Pan, Zhifei [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Guangdou [1 ,2 ]
Andriamanohiarisoamanana, Fetra J. [2 ]
Yamashiro, Takaki [2 ]
Iwasaki, Masahiro [2 ]
Umetsu, Kazutaka [2 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Univ Technol, Sch Environm Engn, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Obihiro Univ Agr & Vet Med, Grad Sch Anim & Food Hyg, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
关键词
anaerobic co-digestion; dairy manure; Japanese knotweed; methane yield; synergistic effect;
D O I
10.1111/asj.13523
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure and lignocellulosic biomass is a potent approach for sustainable biomethane production. Co-digestion of dairy manure (DM) and Japanese knotweed (JK), which was collected from a riverbank, was investigated at five different DM-to-JK mixing ratios (100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 60:40, and 0:100; wet weight basis) under thermophilic condition. The results showed that the methane yields obtain from the co-digestion of DM and JK were much higher than that obtained from JK alone (104 ml/gVS), which indicates the synergistic effect and the benefits of co-digesting JK with DM. The highest methane yield (232 ml/gVS) was obtained from the DM-to-JK ratio of 90:10, which was 14.9% and 123.1% higher than that from DM and JK alone, respectively. It also showed the highest synergistic effect (61 mI/gVS). However, further increase in JK ratios led to the decrease in methane yield and synergistic effect. Therefore, applying the co-digestion of DM and JK at a ratio of 90:10 is recommended for biomethane production.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat and bone meal and crude glycerol: Process performance and digestate valorization [J].
Andriamanohiarisoamanana, Fetra J. ;
Saikawa, Aya ;
Kan, Takumi ;
Qi, Guangdou ;
Pan, Zhifei ;
Yamashiro, Takaki ;
Iwasaki, Masahiro ;
Ihara, Ikko ;
Nishida, Takehiro ;
Umetsu, Kazutaka .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 128 :1-8
[2]   High-solids anaerobic mono-digestion of riverbank grass under thermophilic conditions [J].
Andriamanohiarisoamanana, Fetra J. ;
Matsunami, Nobuyuki ;
Yamashiro, Takaki ;
Iwasaki, Masahiro ;
Ihara, Ikko ;
Umetsu, Kazutaka .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2017, 52 :29-38
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[4]   Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges [J].
Appels, Lise ;
Lauwers, Joost ;
Degreve, Jan ;
Helsen, Lieve ;
Lievens, Bart ;
Willems, Kris ;
Van Impe, Jan ;
Dewil, Raf .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) :4295-4301
[5]   Identification of synergistic impacts during anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes [J].
Astals, S. ;
Batstone, D. J. ;
Mata-Alvarez, J. ;
Jensen, P. D. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 169 :421-427
[6]   Dry fractionation process as an important step in current and future lignocellulose biorefineries: A review [J].
Barakat, Abdellatif ;
de Vries, Hugo ;
Rouau, Xavier .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 134 :362-373
[7]   Anaerobic co-digestion of commercial food waste and dairy manure: Characterizing biochemical parameters and synergistic effects [J].
Ebner, Jacqueline H. ;
Labatut, Rodrigo A. ;
Lodge, Jeffrey S. ;
Williamson, Anahita A. ;
Trabold, Thomas A. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 :286-294
[8]   Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste [J].
El-Mashad, Hamed M. ;
Zhang, Ruihong .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (11) :4021-4028
[9]   Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production [J].
He, Yanfeng ;
Pang, Yunzhi ;
Liu, Yanping ;
Li, Xiujin ;
Wang, Kuisheng .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2008, 22 (04) :2775-2781
[10]   Antagonistic effects on biogas and methane output when co-digesting cattle and pig slurries with grass silage in in vitro batch anaerobic digestion [J].
Himanshu, H. ;
Murphy, J. D. ;
Grant, J. ;
O'Kiely, P. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 109 :190-198