Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer biopsies is not affected by accelerated tissue processing

被引:5
|
作者
Bulte, Joris P. [1 ]
Halilovic, Altuna [2 ]
Kalkman, Shona [3 ]
van Cleef, Patricia H. J. [2 ]
van Diest, Paul J. [3 ]
Strobbe, Luc J. A. [4 ]
de Wilt, Johannes H. W. [1 ]
Bult, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Gen Surg, Med Ctr, POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Pathol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
accelerated processing; breast cancer; core needle biopsy; diagnosis; formalin fixation time; HER2; status; histology; one-stop-shop; DEPENDENT PROBE AMPLIFICATION; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; FIXATION TIME; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; RELIABILITY; MLPA;
D O I
10.1111/his.13507
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimsTo establish whether core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens processed with an accelerated processing method with short fixation time can be used to determine accurately the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of breast cancer. Methods and resultsA consecutive case-series from two high-volume breast clinics was created. We compared routine HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment between accelerated processing CNB specimens and routinely processed postoperative excision specimens. Additional amplification-based testing was performed in cases with equivocal results. The formalin fixation time was less than 2 h and between 6 and 72 h, respectively. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were used for amplification testing. One hundred and forty-four cases were included, 15 of which were HER2-positive on the routinely processed excision specimens. On the CNB specimens, 44 were equivocal on IHC and required an amplification-based test. Correlation between the CNB specimens and the corresponding excision specimens was high for final HER2 status, with an accuracy of 97% and a kappa of 0.85. ConclusionsHER2 status can be determined reliably on CNB specimens with accelerated processing time using standard clinical testing methods. Using this accelerated technology the minimum 6 h of formalin fixation, which current guidelines consider necessary, can be decreased safely. This allows for a complete and expedited histology-based diagnosis of breast lesions in the setting of a one-stop-shop, same-day breast clinic.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study of the Reproducibility of Silver In-situ Hybridisation for the Assessment of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer
    Lawes, K.
    Bagwan, I.
    Haagsma, B.
    Jackson, P.
    Di Palma, S.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2012, 226 : S12 - S12
  • [42] Reliability of the HER2 status assessment by immunohistochemistry for breast cancer patients after preoperative chemotherapy
    Banna, Giuseppe L.
    Gulio, Giuseppe
    Masci, Giovanna
    Simonelli, Matteo
    Rimassa, Lorenza
    Di Tommaso, Luca
    Bettio, Daniela
    Roncalli, Massimo
    Santoro, Armando
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 105 - 105
  • [43] Impact of chromosome 17 centromere region assessment on HER2 status reported in breast cancer
    Egervari, Kristof
    Kosa, Csaba
    Szollosi, Zoltan
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2011, 207 (08) : 468 - 471
  • [44] Assessment of HER2 Status on Needle Core Biopsy of Breast Cancer: Impact of Histopathological Concordance
    Pigera, M.
    Lee, A. H. S.
    Ellis, I. O.
    Rakha, E. A.
    Hodi, Z.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2015, 237 : S18 - S18
  • [45] Reassessment of HER2 status in breast cancer patients with initially HER2 negative or HER2 unknown primary tumors at the time of metastatic disease by serum HER2 and HER2 status of circulating tumor cells
    Fehm, T.
    Solomayer, E.
    Uhr, J.
    Wallwiener, D.
    ONKOLOGIE, 2008, 31 : 51 - 51
  • [46] 2021 update of the GEFPICS' recommendations for HER2 status assessment in invasive breast cancer in France
    Franchet, Camille
    Djerroudi, Lounes
    Maran-Gonzalez, Aurelie
    Abramovici, Olivia
    Antoine, Martine
    Becette, Veronique
    Berghian, Anca
    Blanc-Fournier, Cecile
    Brabencova, Eva
    Charafe-Jauffret, Emmanuelle
    Chenard, Marie-Pierre
    Dauplat, Marie-Melanie
    Delree, Paul
    Duprez-Paumier, Raphaelle
    Fleury, Clemence
    Ghnassia, Jean-Pierre
    Haudebourg, Juliette
    Leroux, Agnes
    MacGrogan, Gaetan
    Mathieu, Marie-Christine
    Michenet, Patrick
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Poulet, Bruno
    Robin, Yves Marie
    Roger, Pascal
    Russ, Elisabeth
    Tixier, Lucie
    Treilleux, Isabelle
    Valent, Alexander
    Verriele, Veronique
    Vincent-Salomon, Anne
    Arnould, Laurent
    Lacroix-Triki, Magali
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2021, 41 (06) : 507 - 520
  • [47] Assessment of HER2 status on fixed breast cancer sections by real-time PCR
    Irani-Hakime, N
    Rassi, S
    Mansour, A
    Jureidini, I
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 355 : S441 - S441
  • [48] UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer: an update
    Rakha, Emad A.
    Tan, Puay Hoon
    Quinn, Cecily
    Provenzano, Elena
    Shaaban, Abeer M.
    Deb, Rahul
    Callagy, Grace
    Starczynski, Jane
    Lee, Andrew H. S.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (04) : 217 - 227
  • [49] Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer
    Rakha, Emad A.
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    Ibrahim, Merdol
    Starczynski, Jane
    Carder, Pauline J.
    Provenzano, Elena
    Hanby, Andrew
    Hales, Sally
    Lee, Andrew H. S.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 68 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [50] Prognostic difference between early breast cancer patients with HER2 low and HER2 zero status
    Cha, Chihwan David
    Kim, Kyung Eun
    Kim, Jungbin
    Um, Eunhae
    Choi, Nayeon
    Lee, Jungsun
    Gwak, Geumhee
    Kim, Jae Il
    Chung, Min Sung
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2025, 11 (01)