Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring

被引:294
作者
Karagulian, Federico [1 ]
Barbiere, Maurizio [1 ]
Kotsev, Alexander [1 ]
Spinelle, Laurent [2 ,3 ]
Gerboles, Michel [1 ]
Lagler, Friedrich [1 ]
Redon, Nathalie [4 ]
Crunaire, Sabine [4 ]
Borowiak, Annette [1 ]
机构
[1] JRC, European Commiss, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[2] Inst Natl Environm Ind & Risques INERIS, Parc Technol Alata,BP 2, F-60550 Verneuil En Halatte, France
[3] LCSQA, Parc Technol Alata,BP 2, F-60550 Verneuil En Halatte, France
[4] Univ Lille, IMT Lille Douai, SAGE Dept Sci Atmosphere & Genie Environm, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
electrochemical sensors; metal oxide sensors; optical particle counters; nephelometers; citizen science; performance evaluation; sensor validation; air quality monitoring; PARTICULATE MATTER; GAS SENSORS; ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS; FIELD CALIBRATION; PARTICLE COUNTER; AMBIENT AIR; LABORATORY EVALUATION; AMPEROMETRIC SENSORS; AVAILABLE SENSORS; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.3390/atmos10090506
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A growing number of companies have started commercializing low-cost sensors (LCS) that are said to be able to monitor air pollution in outdoor air. The benefit of the use of LCS is the increased spatial coverage when monitoring air quality in cities and remote locations. Today, there are hundreds of LCS commercially available on the market with costs ranging from several hundred to several thousand euro. At the same time, the scientific literature currently reports independent evaluation of the performance of LCS against reference measurements for about 110 LCS. These studies report that LCS are unstable and often affected by atmospheric conditions-cross-sensitivities from interfering compounds that may change LCS performance depending on site location. In this work, quantitative data regarding the performance of LCS against reference measurement are presented. This information was gathered from published reports and relevant testing laboratories. Other information was drawn from peer-reviewed journals that tested different types of LCS in research studies. Relevant metrics about the comparison of LCS systems against reference systems highlighted the most cost-effective LCS that could be used to monitor air quality pollutants with a good level of agreement represented by a coefficient of determination R-2 > 0.75 and slope close to 1.0. This review highlights the possibility to have versatile LCS able to operate with multiple pollutants and preferably with transparent LCS data treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:41
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Review of Small Commercial Sensors for Indicative Monitoring of Ambient Gas [J].
Aleixandre, Manuel ;
Gerboles, Michel .
NOSE 2012: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL ODOUR MONITORING AND CONTROL, 2012, 30 :169-174
[2]   Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models [J].
Alexander, D. L. J. ;
Tropsha, A. ;
Winkler, David A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (07) :1316-1322
[3]   Towards the Development of a Low Cost Airborne Sensing System to Monitor Dust Particles after Blasting at Open-Pit Mine Sites [J].
Alvarado, Miguel ;
Gonzalez, Felipe ;
Fletcher, Andrew ;
Doshi, Ashray .
SENSORS, 2015, 15 (08) :19667-19687
[4]  
[Anonymous], AIRSENSEUR OPEN DA A
[5]  
AQ-SPEC, S COAST AIR QUAL MAN
[6]   Laboratory Evaluation of the Shinyei PPD42NS Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor [J].
Austin, Elena ;
Novosselov, Igor ;
Seto, Edmund ;
Yost, Michael G. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09)
[7]   Optical particulate matter sensors in PM2.5 measurements in atmospheric air [J].
Badura, Marek ;
Batog, Piotr ;
Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta ;
Modzel, Piotr .
10TH CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENGINEERING EKO-DOK 2018, 2018, 44
[8]   COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION - SOME LIMITATIONS [J].
BARRETT, JP .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1974, 28 (01) :19-20
[9]   Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application [J].
Bigi, Alessandro ;
Mueller, Michael ;
Grange, Stuart K. ;
Ghermandi, Grazia ;
Hueglin, Christoph .
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (06) :3717-3735
[10]   Precision and Accuracy of a Direct-Reading Miniaturized Monitor in PM2.5 Exposure Assessment [J].
Borghi, Francesca ;
Spinazze, Andrea ;
Campagnolo, Davide ;
Rovelli, Sabrina ;
Cattaneo, Andrea ;
Cavallo, Domenico M. .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)