Impact of Resistance Therapy on Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:16
作者
Collado-Garrido, Luisa [1 ]
Paras-Bravo, Paula [2 ,3 ]
Calvo-Martin, Pilar [1 ]
Santibanez-Marguello, Miguel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Marques de Valdecilla Univ Hosp, Rehabil Serv, Valdecilla Ave S-N, Santander 39008, Cantabria, Spain
[2] Univ Cantabria, Fac Nursing, Valdecilla Ave S-N, Santander 39008, Cantabria, Spain
[3] Res Nursing Grp IDIVAL, Cardenal Herrera Oria St S-N, Cantabria 3901, Spain
[4] Univ Cantabria, Global Hlth Res Grp, Santander 39008, Cantabria, Spain
关键词
Cerebral palsy; resistance therapy; motor skills; child; meta-analysis; LOWER-LIMB; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; SPASTIC DIPLEGIA; MUSCLE STRENGTH; CLINICAL-TRIALS; GAIT FUNCTION; EXERCISE; QUALITY; INTERVENTIONS; IMPAIRMENTS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph16224513
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cerebral palsy is one of the main causes of disability in childhood. Resistance therapy shows benefits in increasing strength and gait in these patients, but its impact on motor function is not yet clear. The objective was to analyze the impact of resistance therapy on the improvement in the motor function using a review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature research was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Knowledge, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) in relation to clinical trials in which resistance therapy was used and motor function was assessed. Twelve controlled clinical trials and three non-controlled clinical trials (only one intervention arm) studies were identified. In terms of pre-post difference, the overall intra-group effect was in favor of resistance therapy intervention: standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21 to 0.52, p < 0.001 (random-effects model), with moderate heterogeneity (I-2 = 59.82%). SMDs were also positive by restricting to each of the analyzed scales: SMD = 0.37, 1.33, 0.10, and 0.36 for Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Lateral Step Up (LSU), Time Up and Go (TUG), and Mobility Questionnaire (MobQue) scales, respectively. Regarding the difference between groups, the results showed a high heterogeneity (I-2 < 99%), with the mean difference (MD) also favorable for the GMFM scale: MD = 1.73, 95% CI = 0.81 to 2.64, p < 0.001 (random-effects model). Our results support a positive impact of resistance therapy on motor function. Further studies should delve into the clinical relevance of these results.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 42 条
[41]   The delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus [J].
Verhagen, AP ;
de Vet, HCW ;
de Bie, RA ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Boers, M ;
Bouter, LM ;
Knipschild, PG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (12) :1235-1241
[42]   Muscle Strengthening in Children and Adolescents With Spastic Cerebral Palsy: Considerations for Future Resistance Training Protocols [J].
Verschuren, Olaf ;
Ada, Louise ;
Maltais, Desiree B. ;
Gorter, Jan Willem ;
Scianni, Aline ;
Ketelaar, Marjolijn .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 91 (07) :1130-1139