4E modeling and multi-criteria optimization of CCHPW gas turbine plant with inlet air cooling and steam injection

被引:37
作者
Sanaye, Sepehr [1 ]
Amani, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Amani, Pouria [3 ]
机构
[1] IUST, Sch Mech Engn, ESIL, Tehran 16844, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Mech & Energy Engn Dept, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Chem Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
CCHPW system; Steam injected gas turbine; Compressor inlet air cooling; Exergetic efficiency; Total annual cost; Multi-objective optimization; COMBINED-CYCLE; THERMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT; ABSORPTION CHILLER; DECISION-MAKING; BIOMASS FUEL; POWER-SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; INTEGRATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2018.06.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An integrated plant for production of combined cooling, heating, power and water (CCHPW) has been investigated here. The plant included a gas turbine (with steam injection in combustion chamber), an HRSG producing steam (with reheat and dual drum pressures) and absorption refrigeration system (for both space and inlet air cooling). Four E (Energy, Exergy, Environmental, and Economic) modeling and optimization of an integrated CCHPW plant was performed to evaluate the optimum values of nine design parameters. Multi-objective optimization of CCHPW plant using genetic algorithm method with exergy efficiency and total annual cost (TAC) of system as two objective functions was applied. Results showed that at the optimum design point, compressor inlet air temperature was 18.5 degrees C and steam injection into combustion chamber of gas turbine was 1.8%. The exergetic efficiency and TAC of integrated CCHPW plant at the selected optimum point was 30.7% and 28.545 million dollars, respectively. The payback period of about 4.38 years was estimated for the analyzed plant at the optimum design point. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of change in capital investment and fuel costs on the optimal values of design parameters was also performed and presented.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 81
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Effects of applying non-thermal plasma on combustion stability and emissions of NOx and CO in a model gas turbine combustor [J].
Kim, Gyeong Taek ;
Seo, Bo Hyeon ;
Lee, Won June ;
Park, Jeong ;
Kim, Min Kuk ;
Lee, Sang Min .
FUEL, 2017, 194 :321-328
[22]  
Lauer M., 2017, COMBUST FUELS EMIS A, V4
[23]  
Lipperheide M., 2017, CERAM CONTROL DIAGNO, V6
[24]   Thermoeconomic analysis of gas turbine based cycles [J].
Massardo, AF ;
Scialò, M .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (04) :664-671
[25]   Analysis of parameters affecting the performance of gas turbines and combined cycle plants with vapor absorption inlet air cooling [J].
Mohapatra, Alok K. ;
Sanjay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 38 (02) :223-240
[26]   The optimal design and 4E analysis of double pressure HRSG utilizing steam injection for Damavand power plant [J].
Mokhtari, Hamid ;
Ahmadisedigh, Hossein ;
Ameri, Mohammad .
ENERGY, 2017, 118 :399-413
[27]   Stationary gas turbines and primary energies:: A review of fuel influence on energy and combustion performances [J].
Molière, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2000, 39 (02) :141-172
[28]   Techno-economic assessments of advanced Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) technology for the new electricity market in the United Arab Emirates [J].
Mondol, Jayanta Deb ;
Carr, Cillian .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2017, 19 :160-172
[29]   Regenerative steam-injection gas-turbine systems [J].
Nishida, K ;
Takagi, T ;
Kinoshita, S .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2005, 81 (03) :231-246
[30]   Pareto optimization of a combined cycle power system as a decision support tool for trading off investment vs. operating costs [J].
Roosen, P ;
Uhlenbruck, S ;
Lucas, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2003, 42 (06) :553-560