An in vivo method for the quantitative evaluation of local anesthetics

被引:18
作者
Grant, GJ [1 ]
Piskoun, B [1 ]
Lin, A [1 ]
Bansinath, M [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
local anesthetics; mice; vocalization response; electrical stimulation; skin;
D O I
10.1016/S1056-8719(00)00079-4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We describe a mouse model for evaluation of skill anesthesia after infiltration of local anesthetic. The method involves subcutaneous injection of the anesthetic over the abdomen, and monitoring the vocalization response to electrical stimulus as a measure of analgesia. Prior to drug injection, the vocalization threshold was determined. Mice that vocalized at less than or equal to 8 mA were included in the study. The model was tested using representative agents of the two classes of local anesthetics, bupivacaine, an amide, and chloroprocaine, an ester. The time course and dose response were assessed after injection. The median analgesic time was 15, 40, and 55 min for 0.015%, 0.0625%, and 0.25% bupivacaine and 30, 50, and 55 min for 0.125%, 0.25%, and 2.0% chloroprocaine, respectively. Statistical analysis of the data showed that this method is sufficiently sensitive to detect differences between the dose and duration of local anesthesia (p < 0.05, by log rank test of the survival curves). To further validate the model, we compared the duration of anesthesia between the 0.5% bupivacaine and a new long - acting liposomal formulation of 2% bupivacaine. The results showed that the new formulation significantly prolonged the duration of anesthesia (p < 0.05). This simple and reliable method may facilitate research on the pharmacology of infiltration anesthesia and the development of new local anesthetics and/or formulations. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 72
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
COVINO BG, 1976, LOCAL ANESTHETICS ME, P41
[2]  
GRANT GJ, 1994, REGION ANESTH, V19, P264
[3]  
GRANT GJ, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V75, P889
[4]   ASSESSING LOCAL-ANESTHETIC EFFECT USING THE MOUSE TAIL-FLICK TEST [J].
GRANT, GJ ;
ZAKOWSKI, MI ;
VERMEULEN, K ;
LANGERMAN, L ;
RAMANATHAN, S ;
TURNDORF, H .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 1993, 29 (04) :223-226
[5]  
GRANT GJ, 1999, REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, V24, pS42
[6]   A METHOD FOR TESTING ANALGESICS IN MICE [J].
GREWAL, RS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1952, 7 (03) :433-437
[7]   Audible and ultrasonic vocalization elicited by a nociceptive stimulus in rat: Relationship with respiration [J].
Jourdan, D ;
Ardid, D ;
Chapuy, E ;
LeBars, D ;
Eschalier, A .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 38 (02) :109-116
[8]   AUDIBLE AND ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATION ELICITED BY SINGLE ELECTRICAL NOCICEPTIVE STIMULI TO THE TAIL IN THE RAT [J].
JOURDAN, D ;
ARDID, D ;
CHAPUY, E ;
ESCHALIER, A ;
LEBARS, D .
PAIN, 1995, 63 (02) :237-249
[9]  
Kuzma PJ, 1997, REGION ANESTH, V22, P543
[10]  
LANGERMAN L, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P490