Emerging Camelina Protein: Extraction, Modification, and Structural/Functional Characterization

被引:47
作者
Boyle, Claire [1 ]
Hansen, Lucy [1 ]
Hinnenkamp, Chelsey [1 ]
Ismail, Baraem P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Food Sci & Nutr, 1334 Eckles Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Camelina protein concentrate; Structural characteristics; Functional properties; Salt protein extraction; Alkaline protein extraction; FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES; SOY PROTEIN; SOLUBILITY CHARACTERISTICS; THERMAL-STABILITY; CANOLA PROTEINS; HYDROLYSIS; FRACTIONS; KINETICS; QUALITY; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1002/aocs.12045
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Camelina sativa, a sustainable oilseed crop, is a novel source of plant protein. The aim of this work was to evaluate two protein extraction approaches, alkaline and salt extraction, and determine their impact on the structural and functional properties of camelina protein. Protein yield, content, structural characteristics, and functional properties of the produced camelina protein concentrates (CPC, 70-80% protein) and camelina protein hydrolysates were assessed and compared to reference proteins, whey protein isolate and soy protein isolate (SPI). Compared to alkaline pH extraction, data showed that salt extraction produces less denatured and more functional CPC, composed mainly of cruciferin and napin proteins. The functionality of the salt-extracted CPC was comparable and sometimes better than that of SPI. Specifically, the solubility (similar to 70%) of the salt-extracted CPC at pH 3.4 was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that (similar to 50%) of SPI. Additionally, salt-extracted CPC had significantly higher emulsification capacity and foaming capacity than SPI. On the other hand, the gelation property of CPC was inferior to that of SPI, an observation attributed to the molecular size of camelina protein compared to soy protein. Upon hydrolysis of CPC with Aspergillus oryzae protease, a limited benefit to solubility was noted at pH 7 postthermal treatment. Overall, results revealed the potential of camelina as a novel source of functional plant protein that might gain a position in the protein market place, and possibly compete with soy protein for several applications targeting the use of plant proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1062
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Lampart-Szczapa E, 2001, C F P F C S, P407
  • [22] Protein solubility characteristics of commercial soy protein products
    Lee, KH
    Ryu, HS
    Rhee, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2003, 80 (01) : 85 - 90
  • [23] Li N, 2014, T ASABE, V57, P169
  • [24] Adhesion properties of camelina protein fractions isolated with different methods
    Li, Ningbo
    Qi, Guangyan
    Sun, Xiuzhi Susan
    Xu, Feng
    Wang, Donghai
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2015, 69 : 263 - 272
  • [25] Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Activity of Soy Protein Subjected to Selective Hydrolysis and Thermal Processing
    Margatan, Wynnie
    Ruud, Kirsten
    Wang, Qian
    Markowski, Todd
    Ismail, Baraem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2013, 61 (14) : 3460 - 3467
  • [26] Oakenfull D., 1997, Food Proteins and Their Application, P111
  • [27] Enzymatic Hydrolysis Does Not Reduce the Biological Reactivity of Soybean Proteins for All Allergic Subjects
    Panda, Rakhi
    Tetteh, Afua O.
    Pramod, Siddanakoppalu N.
    goodman, Richard E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2015, 63 (43) : 9629 - 9639
  • [28] Brassica carinata protein isolates:: chemical composition, protein characterization and improvement of functional properties by protein hydrolysis
    Pedroche, J
    Yust, MM
    Lqari, H
    Girón-Calle, J
    Alaiz, M
    Vioque, J
    Millán, F
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2004, 88 (03) : 337 - 346
  • [29] The effect of limited proteolysis on canola protein gelation
    Pinterits, Alexandra
    Arntfield, Susan D.
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2007, 102 (04) : 1337 - 1343
  • [30] Functional properties of improved glycinin and β-conglycinin fractions
    Rickert, DA
    Johnson, LA
    Murphy, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2004, 69 (04) : C303 - C311