Genetic data in population viability analysis: case studies with ambystomatid salamanders

被引:22
作者
Greenwald, K. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Organismal Biol, Aronoff Lab 300, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Ambystoma; assignment test; habitat fragmentation; metapopulation; population viability analysis; AMPHIBIAN POPULATIONS; LARVAL DENSITY; METAPOPULATION; HABITAT; LANDSCAPE; DYNAMICS; CONSERVATION; PERSISTENCE; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00339.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Parameterization of population viability models is a complicated task for most types of animals, as knowledge of population demography, abundance and connectivity can be incomplete or unattainable. Here I illustrate several ways in which genetic data can be used to inform population viability analysis, via the parameterization of both initial abundance and dispersal matrices. As case studies, I use three ambysomatid salamander datasets to address the following question: how do population viability predictions change when dispersal estimates are based on genetic assignment test data versus a general dispersal-distance function? Model results showed that no local population was large enough to ensure long-term persistence in the absence of immigration, suggesting a metapopulation structure. Models parameterized with a dispersal-distance function resulted in much more optimistic predictions than those incorporating genetic data in the dispersal estimates. Under the dispersal-distance function scenario all local populations persisted; however, using genetic assignments to infer dispersal revealed local populations at risk of extinction. Viability estimates based on dispersal-distance functions should be interpreted with caution, especially in heterogeneous landscapes. In these situations I promote the idea of model parameterization using genetic assignment tests for a more accurate portrayal of real-world dispersal patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Integrating landscape and metapopulation modeling approaches:: Viability of the sharp-tailed grouse in a dynamic landscape [J].
Akçakaya, HR ;
Radeloff, VC ;
Mlandenoff, DJ ;
He, HS .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) :526-537
[2]   A habitat based metapopulation model of the California gnatcatcher [J].
Akcakaya, HR ;
Atwood, JL .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1997, 11 (02) :422-434
[3]  
AKCAKAYA HR, 1998, RAMAS GIS LINKING LA
[4]   Global amphibian declines: A problem in applied ecology [J].
Alford, RA ;
Richards, SJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1999, 30 :133-165
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Metapopulation biology
[6]   Genetic diversity, population structure, effective population size and demographic history of the Finnish wolf population [J].
Aspi, J ;
Roininen, E ;
Ruokonen, M ;
Kojola, I ;
Vilà, C .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2006, 15 (06) :1561-1576
[7]  
Beaumont MA, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P2013
[8]   Can assignment tests measure dispersal? [J].
Berry, O ;
Tocher, MD ;
Sarre, SD .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (03) :551-561
[9]   A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools [J].
Compton, Bradley W. ;
McGarigal, Kevin ;
Cushman, Samuel A. ;
Gamble, Lloyd R. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (03) :788-799
[10]   Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus [J].
Cushman, SA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 128 (02) :231-240