Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women

被引:0
作者
Pearlman, Mark
Jeudy, Myrlene
Chelmow, David
机构
关键词
ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; BENEFITS; HARMS; RECOMMENDATION; CHILDHOOD; RADIATION; INTERVAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer death in American women (1). Regular screening mammography starting at age 40 years reduces breast cancer mortality in average-risk women (2). Screening, however, also exposes women to harm through false-positive test results and overdiagnosis of biologically indolent lesions. Differences in balancing benefits and harms have led to differences among major guidelines about what age to start, what age to stop, and how frequently to recommend mammography screening in average-risk women (2-4). Breast cancer risk assessment is very important for identifying women who may benefit from more intensive breast cancer surveillance; however, there is no standardized approach to office-based breast cancer risk assessment in the United States. This can lead to missed opportunities to identify women at high risk of breast cancer and may result in applying average-risk screening recommendations to high-risk women. Risk assessment and identification of women at high risk allow for referral to health care providers with expertise in cancer genetics counseling and testing for breast cancer-related germline mutations (eg, BRCA), patient counseling about risk-reduction options, and cascade testing to identify family members who also may be at increased risk. The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to discuss breast cancer risk assessment, review breast cancer screening guidelines in average-risk women, and outline some of the controversies surrounding breast cancer screening. It will present recommendations for using a framework of shared decision making to assist women in balancing their personal values regarding benefits and harms of screening at various ages and intervals to make personal screening choices from within a range of reasonable options. Recommendations for women at elevated risk and discussion of new technologies, such as tomosynthesis, are beyond the scope of this document and are addressed in other publications of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (5-7).
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E16
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [11] Boyd Norman F, 2013, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, DOI 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e57
  • [12] Screening Outcomes in Older US Women Undergoing Multiple Mammograms in Community Practice: Does Interval, Age, or Comorbidity Score Affect Tumor Characteristics or False Positive Rates?
    Braithwaite, Dejana
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Geller, Berta
    Dittus, Kim
    Moore, Dan
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (05): : 334 - 341
  • [13] Risk profile of breast cancer following atypical hyperplasia detected through organized screening
    Buckley, Elizabeth
    Sullivan, Tom
    Farshid, Gelareh
    Hiller, Janet
    Roder, David
    [J]. BREAST, 2015, 24 (03) : 208 - 212
  • [14] Breast Cancer After Use of Estrogen Plus Progestin and Estrogen Alone Analyses of Data From 2 Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials
    Chlebowski, Rowan T.
    Rohan, Thomas E.
    Manson, JoAnn E.
    Aragaki, Aaron K.
    Kaunitz, Andrew
    Stefanick, Marcia L.
    Simon, Michael S.
    Johnson, Karen C.
    Wactawski-Wende, Jean
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Adams-Campbell, Lucile L.
    Nassir, Rami
    Lessin, Lawrence S.
    Prentice, Ross L.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (03) : 296 - 305
  • [15] Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States)
    Coates, RJ
    Uhler, RJ
    Brogan, DJ
    Gammon, MD
    Malone, KE
    Swanson, CA
    Flagg, EW
    Brinton, LA
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2001, 12 (05) : 431 - 442
  • [16] Interpreting Overdiagnosis Estimates in Population-based Mammography Screening
    de Gelder, Rianne
    Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    Draisma, Gerrit
    de Koning, Harry J.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2011, 33 (01) : 111 - 121
  • [17] Breast cancer risk associated with benign breast disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dyrstad, Sara W.
    Yan, Yan
    Fowler, Amy M.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 149 (03) : 569 - 575
  • [18] Influence of Study Features and Methods on Overdiagnosis Estimates in Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Gulati, Roman
    Mallinger, Leslie
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (11) : 831 - +
  • [19] Breast cancer risk assessment in 8,824 women attending a family history evaluation and screening programme
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    Ingham, Sarah
    Dawe, Sarah
    Roberts, L.
    Lalloo, F.
    Brentnall, A. R.
    Stavrinos, P.
    Howell, Anthony
    [J]. FAMILIAL CANCER, 2014, 13 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [20] Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, 2011, BREAST CANC SCREENIN