The modular hip revision stem made of titanium alloy (MRP-Titan Revision stem) influence and optimisation of bending stiffness

被引:2
作者
Holzwarth, U
Zeiler, G
Lintner, F
Schuh, A
机构
[1] Med Titan, IZMP, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Orthopad Klin Rummelsberg, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
[3] Univ Vienna, Pathol Bakteriol, Vienna, Austria
来源
BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK | 2004年 / 49卷 / 7-8期
关键词
hip endoprosthesis; modular revision stem; MRP-Titan; stem stiffness; Euler's buckling case; radiolucent lines; cement-free revision; bone growth;
D O I
10.1515/BMT.2004.040
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The MRP-Titan Revision stem has proved to be a highly successful implant system for revision arthroplasty of the hip. Good and excellent clinical and radiological results with spontaneous filling of bony defects have been reported, The observation of atrophy of the proximal femur associated with stem diameters > 17mm prompted us to examine the bending stiffness of stems of various diameters. To determine their static bending characteristics, the stems were tested under axial pressure loads in accordance with Euler's buckling case. Dynamic tests were performed with the mono-axial servohydraulic test equipment MTS 810. From a stem diameter of 18 mm upwards, deflection of the stem under loading decreased disproportionately, in direct correlation with the stem stiffness. By optimising the geometry and varying the alloy it is possible to obtain a constant ISD factor for the modular MRP-Titan revision stem Conclusion: The MRP-Titan revision stem is a reliable implant system for revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clinical findings of atrophy of the proximal femur associated with stem diameters >17mm was found to be correlated with a disproportionate increase in bending stiffness. The aim of further developments will be to reduce the stiffness of larger-diameter stems by making changes to the design and/or to the alloy (Ti15Mo,Ti13Nb13Zr,Ti12Mo6Zr2Fe2).
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 221
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement - A prospective comparison of two different implant designs [J].
Ang, KC ;
De, SD ;
Goh, JCH ;
Low, SL ;
Bose, K .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (04) :675-679
[2]  
BEITZ W, 2001, TASCHENBUCH MASCHINE
[3]  
BOBYN JD, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P79
[4]   Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement [J].
Bugbee, WD ;
Culpepper, WJ ;
Engh, CA ;
Engh, CA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (07) :1007-1012
[5]  
Cameron H U, 1993, J Arthroplasty, V8, P239, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80084-7
[6]  
CHANDLER HP, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V319, P130
[7]  
Dujovne A R, 1993, J Arthroplasty, V8, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80102-6
[8]   POROUS-COATED HIP-REPLACEMENT - THE FACTORS GOVERNING BONE INGROWTH, STRESS SHIELDING, AND CLINICAL-RESULTS [J].
ENGH, CA ;
BOBYN, JD ;
GLASSMAN, AH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (01) :45-55
[9]  
Engh CA, 1999, J ARTHROPLASTY, V14, P637
[10]  
ENGH CA, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V231, P7