Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?

被引:42
作者
Kalt, Gerald [1 ]
Mayer, Andreas [1 ]
Theurl, Michaela C. [1 ]
Lauk, Christian [1 ]
Erb, Karl-Heinz [1 ]
Haberl, Helmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna BOKU, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Inst Social Ecol SEC, Schottenfeldgasse 29, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 11期
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
bioenergy; carbon accounting; carbon sequestration; carbon stock change; climate change mitigation; CO2; energy plantations; land use; land-use change; natural climate solution; natural succession; reforestation; short rotation coppice; FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSTITUTION; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; FOREST BIOENERGY; LAND-USE; POPULUS-DELTOIDES; BIO-ENERGY; STORAGE; BIOMASS; POPLAR; SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12626
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Short rotation plantations are often considered as holding vast potentials for future global bioenergy supply. In contrast to raising biomass harvests in forests, purpose-grown biomass does not interfere with forest carbon (C) stocks. Provided that agricultural land can be diverted from food and feed production without impairing food security, energy plantations on current agricultural land appear as a beneficial option in terms of renewable, climate-friendly energy supply. However, instead of supporting energy plantations, land could also be devoted to natural succession. It then acts as a long-term C sink which also results in C benefits. We here compare the sink strength of natural succession on arable land with the C saving effects of bioenergy from plantations. Using geographically explicit data on global cropland distribution among climate and ecological zones, regionally specific C accumulation rates are calculated with IPCC default methods and values. C savings from bioenergy are given for a range of displacement factors (DFs), acknowledging the varying efficiency of bioenergy routes and technologies in fossil fuel displacement. A uniform spatial pattern is assumed for succession and bioenergy plantations, and the considered timeframes range from 20 to 100 years. For many parameter settings-in particular, longer timeframes and high DFs-bioenergy yields higher cumulative C savings than natural succession. Still, if woody biomass displaces liquid transport fuels or natural gas-based electricity generation, natural succession is competitive or even superior for timeframes of 20-50 years. This finding has strong implications with climate and environmental policies: Freeing land for natural succession is a worthwhile low-cost natural climate solution that has many co-benefits for biodiversity and other ecosystem services. A considerable risk, however, is C stock losses (i.e., emissions) due to disturbances or land conversion at a later time.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1297
页数:15
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
AGOSTINI A., 2013, JRC TECHNICAL REPORT
[2]   Carbon implications of converting cropland to bioenergy crops or forest for climate mitigation: a global assessment [J].
Albanito, Fabrizio ;
Beringer, Tim ;
Corstanje, Ronald ;
Poulter, Benjamin ;
Stephenson, Anna ;
Zawadzka, Joanna ;
Smith, Pete .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01) :81-95
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 21 C PART
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CR BIOL, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CRVI.2014.11.004
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Monte Carlo simulation
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Renewables 2018 Global Status Report
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PERSP EN TRANS INV N
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, AGR FORESTRY OTHER L
[10]   Land use change effects on ecosystem carbon balance: From agricultural to hybrid poplar plantation [J].
Arevalo, Carmela B. M. ;
Bhatti, Jagtar S. ;
Chang, Scott X. ;
Sidders, Derek .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 141 (3-4) :342-349