Prevalence of and risk factors for canine tick infestation in the United States, 2002-2004

被引:23
作者
Raghavan, Malathi
Glickman, Nita
Moore, George
Caldanaro, Richard
Lewis, Hugh
Glickman, Larry
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Fac Med, Off Dean, Brodie Ctr 260, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Vet Pathobiol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Banfield Pet Hosp, Portland, OR USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/vbz.2006.0570
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Knowledge of the geographic range and seasonal activity of vector ticks is important for determining which people or animals are at risk of acquiring tick-borne infections. Several time-consuming methods requiring large-scale organization are used to map geographic and seasonal variations in tick distribution. A cost-effective, complementary approach to study tick distribution using a large nation-wide veterinary database is described in this paper. Prevalence of canine tick infestation in 40 states was estimated by analyzing electronic medical records of more than 8 million dog visits to Banfield veterinary hospitals in 2002-2004. Prevalence was defined as the proportion of dog visits in which tick infestation was recorded, and was expressed per 10,000 dog visits with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The overall prevalence (CI) of tick infestation was 52 (51, 53) dogs per 10,000 dog visits. Among states, Oklahoma (249 [229, 271] dogs with ticks per 10,000 dog-visits), Arkansas (242 [213, 274]), Connecticut (136 [119, 155]), West Virginia (130 [105, 161]), and Rhode Island (122 [97, 154]) ranked highest in prevalence of canine tick infestation. Overall prevalence peaked from May through July, although monthly prevalence varied by geographic region. In multiple logistic regression, younger dogs, male dogs, and sexually intact dogs, were at increased risk of tick infestation. Toy breeds were least likely to be infested, but no linear pattern of risk was evident with body weight. Identified risk factors should enable veterinarians to prevent tick infestation in pet dogs although differences in risk of tick infestation may be related to outdoor activity of dogs. Feasibility of collecting information for surveillance of vectors ticks on a national level using this large, electronic veterinary database is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 75
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The travels of a lone star tick [J].
Alderdice, JM ;
Burgess, IF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (05) :403-403
[2]   VERTEBRATE HOST RELATIONSHIPS AND DISTRIBUTION OF IXODID TICKS (ACARI, IXODIDAE) IN CONNECTICUT, USA [J].
ANDERSON, JF ;
MAGNARELLI, LA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1980, 17 (04) :314-323
[3]  
ANGULO FJ, 1994, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V205, P1711
[4]  
[Anonymous], STAT METHODS EPIDEMI
[5]   Occurrence of the Gulf Coast tick (Acari: Ixodidae) on wild and domestic mammals in north-central Oklahoma [J].
Barker, RW ;
Kocan, AA ;
Ewing, SA ;
Wettemann, RP ;
Payton, ME .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2004, 41 (02) :170-178
[6]   Ehrlichia ewingii, A newly recognized agent of human ehrlichiosis [J].
Buller, RS ;
Arens, M ;
Hmiel, SP ;
Paddock, CD ;
Sumner, JW ;
Rikihisa, Y ;
Unver, A ;
Gaudreault-Keener, R ;
Manian, FA ;
Liddell, AM ;
Schmulewitz, N ;
Storch, GA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (03) :148-155
[7]   IXODES-DAMMINI (ACARI, IXODIDAE) AND ASSOCIATED IXODID TICKS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL CONNECTICUT, USA [J].
CAREY, AB ;
KRINSKY, WL ;
MAIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1980, 17 (01) :89-99
[8]  
Chomel B. B., 2000, Dogs, zoonoses and public health, P91, DOI 10.1079/9780851994369.0091
[9]   THE GEOGRAPHIC-DISTRIBUTION OF LYME-DISEASE IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
CIESIELSKI, CA ;
MARKOWITZ, LE ;
HORSLEY, R ;
HIGHTOWER, AW ;
RUSSELL, H ;
BROOME, CV .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1988, 539 :283-288
[10]  
Cilek JE, 2000, J MED ENTOMOL, V37, P439, DOI 10.1603/0022-2585(2000)037[0439:SDAAOT]2.0.CO