A Systematic Review of Gastric Acid-Reducing Agent-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions with Orally Administered Medications

被引:63
作者
Patel, Divya [1 ]
Bertz, Richard [1 ]
Ren, Song [2 ]
Boulton, David W. [2 ]
Nagard, Mats [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, 37 S New York Rd, Galloway, NJ 08205 USA
[2] AstraZeneca LP, Quantitat Clin Pharmacol, Innovat Med IMed Biotech Unit, Early Clin Dev, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878 USA
关键词
PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; INTERACTION PROFILES; GASTROINTESTINAL PH; OMEPRAZOLE; ABSORPTION; ANTACIDS; CYTOCHROME-P450; ESOMEPRAZOLE; LANSOPRAZOLE; PANTOPRAZOLE;
D O I
10.1007/s40262-019-00844-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective Several review articles have been published discussing gastric acid-related drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by coadministration of antacids, histamine H-2 receptor antagonists, or proton pump inhibitors, but are not sufficiently comprehensive in capturing all documented DDIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) and tend to focus on gastric pH-dependent DDIs and/or basic drugs. Subsequently, several new drugs have been approved, and new information is available in the literature. The objective of this systematic review is to comprehensively identify oral medications that have clinically meaningful DDIs, including loss of efficacy or adverse effects, with gastric ARAs, and categorize these medications according to mechanism of interaction. Methods An indepth search of clinical data in the PDR3D: Reed Tech Navigator (TM) for Drug Labels, University of Washington Drug-Drug Interaction Database, DailyMed, Drugs@FDA.gov, and UpToDate (R)/Lexicomp (R) Drug and Drug Interaction screening tool was conducted from 1 June to 1 August 2018. The PDR3D, University of Washington Drug-Drug Interaction Database, and DailyMed were searched with terms associated with gastric acid and ARAs. Conflicting findings were further investigated using the UpToDate (R)/Lexicomp (R) screening tool. Clinical relevance was assessed on whether an intervention was needed, and prescribing information and/or literature supporting the DDI. Results Through the search strategy, 121 medications were found to clinically meaningfully interact with ARAs. For 38 medications the mechanism of interaction with ARAs was identified as gastric pH dependent, and for 83 medications the interaction was found to be not gastric pH mediated, with mechanisms involving metabolic enzymes, transporters, chelation, and urine alkalization. Additionally, 109 medications were studied and did not have a clinically meaningful interaction with ARAs. Conclusion This review may provide a resource to healthcare professionals in aiding the care of patients by increasing awareness of interactions with ARAs and may also identify and potentially aid in avoiding clinically relevant DDIs and preventing risk of treatment failure and/or adverse effects. Advances in non-clinical predictions of gastric pH-mediated DDIs may guide the need for a future clinical evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 462
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Food, gastrointestinal pH, and models of oral drug absorption
    Abuhelwa, Ahmad Y.
    Williams, Desmond B.
    Upton, Richard N.
    Foster, David J. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2017, 112 : 234 - 248
  • [2] ALLEN LV, 2010, J PHARM TECHNOL, V26, P167
  • [3] BENDTSEN F, 1989, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V3, P151
  • [4] Early pharmaceutical profiling to predict oral drug absorption: Current status and unmet needs
    Bergstrom, Christel A. S.
    Holm, Rene
    Jorgensen, Soren Astrup
    Andersson, Sara B. E.
    Artursson, Per
    Beato, Stefania
    Borde, Anders
    Box, Karl
    Brewster, Marcus
    Dressman, Jennifer
    Feng, Kung-I.
    Halbert, Gavin
    Kostewicz, Edmund
    McAllister, Mark
    Muenster, Uwe
    Thinnes, Julian
    Taylor, Robert
    Mullertz, Anette
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 57 : 173 - 199
  • [5] Differential substrate and inhibitory activities of ranitidine and famotidine toward human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1; SLC22A1), hOCT2 (SLC22A2), and hOCT3 (SLC22A3)
    Bourdet, DL
    Pritchard, JB
    Thakker, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 315 (03) : 1288 - 1297
  • [6] CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS OF FAMOTIDINE
    ECHIZEN, H
    ISHIZAKI, T
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1991, 21 (03) : 178 - 194
  • [7] MEASUREMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL PH PROFILES IN NORMAL AMBULANT HUMAN-SUBJECTS
    EVANS, DF
    PYE, G
    BRAMLEY, R
    CLARK, AG
    DYSON, TJ
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    [J]. GUT, 1988, 29 (08) : 1035 - 1041
  • [8] Fallingborg J, 1999, DAN MED BULL, V46, P183
  • [9] Comparison of the effects of over-the-counter famotidine and calcium carbonate antacid on postprandial gastric acid - A randomized controlled trial
    Feldman, M
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (18): : 1428 - 1431
  • [10] Membrane transporters in drug development
    Giacomini, Kathleen M.
    Huang, Shiew-Mei
    Tweedie, Donald J.
    Benet, Leslie Z.
    Brouwer, Kim L. R.
    Chu, Xiaoyan
    Dahlin, Amber
    Evers, Raymond
    Fischer, Volker
    Hillgren, Kathleen M.
    Hoffmaster, Keith A.
    Ishikawa, Toshihisa
    Keppler, Dietrich
    Kim, Richard B.
    Lee, Caroline A.
    Niemi, Mikko
    Polli, Joseph W.
    Sugiyama, Yuicchi
    Swaan, Peter W.
    Ware, Joseph A.
    Wright, Stephen H.
    Yee, Sook Wah
    Zamek-Gliszczynski, Maciej J.
    Zhang, Lei
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2010, 9 (03) : 215 - 236