Outcome of treatment of Class II malocclusion by intraoral mandibular distraction

被引:3
作者
Breuning, KH
van Strijen, PJ
Prahl-Andersen, B
Tuinzing, DB
机构
[1] Gelderse Vallei Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ede, Netherlands
[2] ACTA Univ, Dept Orthodont, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, ACTA, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
orthodontics; Class II; mandibular distraction;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.06.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Our aim was to find out long-term results of treatment in patients treated orthodontically and by mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Data on duration of treatment, costs, and results of 26 patients (13 girls and 13 boys) with a mean age of 15 years were analysed. The preoperative cephalograms were compared with those taken at the last follow-up visit. There was a significant reduction in duration of treatment when patients were treated without a first phase that included functional appliances. The differences in costs of orthodontic treatment were not significant. The costs of the operation for distraction were significantly higher compared to BSSO, mainly because of the costs of the distraction devices. Comparison of the cephalograms showed a significant increase in SNB angle, Wits value, ANB angle, overjet, and overbite. The Y-axis, MP/S, and SpP/MP angle increased. Orthodontic treatment and distraction of the mandible was a successful, but more expensive, treatment. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Neurosensory deficit and functional impairment after sagittal ramus osteotomy: A long-term follow-up study [J].
August, M ;
Marchena, J ;
Donady, J ;
Kaban, L .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (11) :1231-1235
[2]  
BENNET JC, 1993, ORTHODONTIC TREATMEN, P24
[3]   The overbite and intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis [J].
Breuning, KH ;
van Strijen, PJ ;
Prahl-Andersen, B ;
Tuinzing, DB .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 32 (02) :119-125
[4]  
BREUNING KH, 2001, CRANIOFACIAL DISTRAC, V29, P278
[5]   Mandibular skeletal growth and modelling between 10 and 15 years of age [J].
Buschang, PH ;
Gandini, LG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2002, 24 (01) :69-79
[6]   Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A historic perspective and future directions [J].
Cope, JB ;
Samchukov, ML ;
Cherkashin, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) :448-460
[7]   Orthopedics in orthodontics: Fiction or reality. A review of the literature .2. [J].
Dermaut, LR ;
Aelbers, CMF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 110 (06) :667-671
[8]   Mandibular lengthening using preprogrammed intraoral tooth-borne distraction devices [J].
Dessner, S ;
Razdolsky, Y ;
El-Bialy, T ;
Evans, CA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (11) :1318-1322
[9]   Histopathologic and biochemical changes in the muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of the mandible [J].
Fisher, E ;
Staffenberg, DA ;
McCarthy, JG ;
Miller, DC ;
Zeng, JB .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 99 (02) :366-371
[10]  
Hönig JF, 2002, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V13, P96