Does environmental regulation policy help improve green production performance? Evidence from China's industry

被引:69
作者
Wang, Chao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Inst Engn, Sch Management, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
continuous difference in difference (DID); environmental regulation; GPP; industrial sectors; market access; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; EMISSION PERFORMANCE; FDI; PANEL; EFFICIENCY; SPILLOVER; EXPORTS; IMPACT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1002/csr.1857
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation (ER) policy is an effective means to improve green production performance (GPP), but how ER policy will affect China's GPP remains to be studied. Therefore, with the panel data of 38 industrial sectors in China during 2004-2015, we employ the continuous difference in difference method and system generalised method of moment method to estimate the impact of ER policy on GPP in the heavily polluting sectors of China. The empirical results show that first, the implementation of ER policy does not significantly improve GPP of heavily polluting sectors during the sample period. Among them, the external technological progress and export learning effect are important factors that hinder their GPP. Second, ER has no lag effect on GPP of 38 industrial sectors, and the increase in research and development investment does not significantly improve GPP. Finally, foreign direct investment has promoted GPP in China's industrial sectors to some extent.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 951
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity [J].
Chen, Yu-Shan ;
Chang, Ching-Hsun .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 116 (01) :107-119
[12]   Spillover Effects of FDI via Exports on Innovation Performance of China's High-Technology Industries [J].
Cheung, Kui Yin .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2010, 19 (65) :541-557
[13]   Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects [J].
Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose ;
Jugend, Daniel ;
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz ;
Gunasekaran, Angappa ;
Latan, Hengky .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 87 :442-451
[14]   lnnovation and R&D management:: are new paradigms observable? [J].
Chiaromonte, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 23 (05) :374-409
[15]   The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan [J].
Chiou, Tzu-Yun ;
Chan, Hing Kai ;
Lettice, Fiona ;
Chung, Sai Ho .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2011, 47 (06) :822-836
[16]   Environmentally sensitive productivity growth and its decompositions in China: a metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index approach [J].
Choi, Yongrok ;
Oh, Dong-hyun ;
Zhang, Ning .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 (03) :1017-1043
[17]   Entry Regulation, Public Ownership and TFP Growth: Industry-Level Evidence from South European Countries [J].
Dimelis, Sophia P. ;
Papaioannou, Sotiris K. .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2016, 84 (06) :749-770
[18]   FDI and environmental regulation: pollution haven or a race to the top? [J].
Dong, Baomin ;
Gong, Jiong ;
Zhao, Xin .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2012, 41 (02) :216-237
[19]   Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and Industrial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model [J].
Feng, Zhijun ;
Chen, Wei .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)
[20]   Technological Innovation and Exports: Unpacking Their Reciprocal Causality [J].
Filipescu, Diana A. ;
Prashantham, Shameen ;
Rialp, Alex ;
Rialp, Josep .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2013, 21 (01) :23-38