Does environmental regulation policy help improve green production performance? Evidence from China's industry

被引:69
作者
Wang, Chao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Inst Engn, Sch Management, Xiangtan, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
continuous difference in difference (DID); environmental regulation; GPP; industrial sectors; market access; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; EMISSION PERFORMANCE; FDI; PANEL; EFFICIENCY; SPILLOVER; EXPORTS; IMPACT; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1002/csr.1857
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation (ER) policy is an effective means to improve green production performance (GPP), but how ER policy will affect China's GPP remains to be studied. Therefore, with the panel data of 38 industrial sectors in China during 2004-2015, we employ the continuous difference in difference method and system generalised method of moment method to estimate the impact of ER policy on GPP in the heavily polluting sectors of China. The empirical results show that first, the implementation of ER policy does not significantly improve GPP of heavily polluting sectors during the sample period. Among them, the external technological progress and export learning effect are important factors that hinder their GPP. Second, ER has no lag effect on GPP of 38 industrial sectors, and the increase in research and development investment does not significantly improve GPP. Finally, foreign direct investment has promoted GPP in China's industrial sectors to some extent.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 951
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[3]  
Baughn C. Christopher, 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, V14, P38, DOI 10.1002/csr.160
[4]   Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: An economic geography model in an international comparative study [J].
Ben Kheder, Sonia ;
Zugravu, Natalia .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 77 :48-61
[5]   Estimating the political, economic and environmental factors' impact on the installed wind capacity development: A system GMM approach [J].
Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe ;
Kilinc, Dilara ;
Onater-Isberk, Esra ;
Yelkenci, Tezer .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 96 :636-644
[6]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[7]  
BP, 2019, BP WORLD EN STAT YB
[8]   Environmental innovation and environmental performance [J].
Carrion-Flores, Carmen E. ;
Innes, Robert .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 59 (01) :27-42
[9]   Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India [J].
Chakraborty, Pavel ;
Chatterjee, Chirantan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (05) :939-955
[10]  
Chen S., 2011, China Economic Quarterly, V10, P735, DOI [10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2011.03.012, DOI 10.13821/J.CNKI.CEQ.2011.03.012]