What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability

被引:39
作者
Uribe, Diego F. [1 ]
Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel [1 ]
Uruburu, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Engn Org Business Adm & Stat, Higher Tech Sch Ind Engn, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
关键词
stakeholder theory; project management; project stakeholder management; sustainability; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; BUSINESS MODEL; INNOVATION; GREEN; RISK; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; TRANSPARENCY; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.3390/su10041300
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays the advance towards sustainability poses a global challenge for modern society as well as for companies. Professionals and academics continually redefine business processes and design management mechanisms in a more appropriate way in order to allow companies to balance economic activity with the environmental and social impact that they generate. Under this complex and dynamic scenario, creating a product, providing a service, or achieving a given result requires a different interpretation of the efficiency paradigm and an adequate socio-environmental intelligence. In the context of project management, sustainability-related knowledge, skills, and suitable tools are necessary to face this challenge. Moreover, its close relationship with stakeholder theory presents an alternative to approach that purpose. This article attempts a systematic review of the literature on stakeholder theory in project management during the past nine years, with the aim of providing a comprehensive view of this relationship, revealing its impact and influence on sustainability, and finding new research paths. We highlight the potential benefits derived from this relationship, either as an instrument for the promotion of corporate social responsibility and inclusive policies, as a means for the generation of shared value and technological innovation, or as a key factor in the strategy and business management of a given project.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 151 条
[41]   Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology [J].
Cuppen, Eefje ;
Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G. C. ;
Pikaar, Ewout ;
Mehos, Donna C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (07) :1347-1359
[42]   A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy [J].
Cuppen, Eefje .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (03) :624-637
[43]   Increasing Business Transparency by Corporate Social Reporting: Development and Problems in Lithuania [J].
Dagiliene, Lina ;
Leitoniene, Sviesa ;
Grencikova, Adriana .
INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2014, 25 (01) :54-61
[45]   Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills [J].
de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro ;
Rabechini Junior, Roque .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (02) :321-340
[46]   How do Universities Make Progress? Stakeholder-Related Mechanisms Affecting Adoption of Sustainability in University Curricula [J].
de Lange, Deborah E. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 118 (01) :103-116
[47]   Stakeholders management systems: Empirical insights from relationship marketing and market orientation perspectives [J].
de Madariaga, J. Garcia ;
Valor, C. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 71 (04) :425-439
[48]  
Denyer D., 2009, The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, P671
[49]   Reclaiming Marginalized Stakeholders [J].
Derry, Robbin .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 111 (02) :253-264
[50]   Beyond stakeholder satisfaction: aiming for a new frontier of sustainable stakeholder trust [J].
Dervitsiotis, KN .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2003, 14 (05) :511-524