Good-Enough Production: Selecting Easier Words Instead of More Accurate Ones

被引:15
作者
Koranda, Mark J. [1 ]
Zettersten, Martin [1 ,2 ]
MacDonald, Maryellen C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
language production; lexical selection; artificial-language game; word accessibility; word frequency; open data; open materials; SPEECH PRODUCTION; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; RETRIEVAL; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/09567976221089603
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dominant theories of language production suggest that word choice-lexical selection-is driven by alignment with the intended message: To talk about a young feline, we choose the most aligned word, kitten. Another factor that could shape lexical selection is word accessibility, or how easy it is to produce a given word (e.g., cat is more accessible than kitten). To test whether producers are also influenced by word accessibility, we designed an artificial lexicon containing high- and low-frequency words whose meanings correspond to compass directions. Participants in a communication game (total N = 181 adults) earned points by producing compass directions, which often required an implicit decision between a high- and low-frequency word. A trade-off was observed across four experiments; specifically, high-frequency words were produced even when less aligned with messages. These results suggest that implicit decisions between words are impacted by accessibility. Of all the times that people have produced cat, sometimes they likely meant kitten.
引用
收藏
页码:1440 / 1451
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints [J].
Amato, Michael S. ;
MacDonald, Maryellen C. .
COGNITION, 2010, 116 (01) :143-148
[2]   Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes [J].
Arnold, Jennifer E. .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2008, 23 (04) :495-527
[3]   LEXICAL PRIMING AND SOUND-TO-SPELLING CONTINGENCY EFFECTS IN NONWORD SPELLING [J].
BARRY, C ;
SEYMOUR, PHK .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 40 (01) :5-40
[4]  
Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI [10.3390/agronomy15020428, 10.1007/s13201-024-02166-7]
[5]   When does word frequency influence written production? [J].
Baus, Cristina ;
Strijkers, Kristof ;
Costa, Albert .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[7]  
Bybee J.L., 2008, LINGUISTIC UNIVERSAL, P108, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199298495.003.0005
[8]   A SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY OF RETRIEVAL IN SENTENCE PRODUCTION [J].
DELL, GS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1986, 93 (03) :283-321
[9]   MEDIATED AND CONVERGENT LEXICAL PRIMING IN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION - A COMMENT [J].
DELL, GS ;
OSEAGHDHA, PG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (04) :604-614
[10]   STAGES IN SENTENCE PRODUCTION - AN ANALYSIS OF SPEECH ERROR DATA [J].
DELL, GS ;
REICH, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1981, 20 (06) :611-629