The Safety of Maternal and Fetal MRI at 3 T

被引:80
作者
Chartier, Andre L. [1 ,2 ]
Bouvier, Monique J. [1 ]
McPherson, Danielle R. [1 ]
Stepenosky, James E. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Taysom, Danielle A. [1 ,4 ]
Marks, Robert M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Ctr San Diego, Dept Radiol, 34800 Bob Wilson Dr,Ste 204, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
[2] Naval Hlth Clin Cherry Point, Dept Radiol, Havelock, NC 28532 USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[4] US Naval Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
3; T; fetus; MRI; pregnancy; safety; MAGNETIC-FIELDS; EXPOSURE; GUIDELINES; PREGNANCY; NOISE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.21400
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of clinical 3-F MRI during pregnancy on fetal growth and neonatal hearing in neonates at low risk of congenital hearing impairment or of brain or chromosomal abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This single-center retrospective case-control study included consecutively born healthy neonates exposed in utero to 3-T MR during MRI for maternal or fetal indications and born between January 2008 and March 2015. Each exposed neonate was randomly matched 1:2 by birth date to healthy control neonates who had not been exposed to MR Infant birth weights were compared by unpaired t test. Hearing impairment between groups was compared by Fisher exact test. RESULTS. There was no significant difference in mean birth weight between the MR-exposed (3398 g) and control (3510 g) neonates (p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in prevalence of hearing impairment (p = 0.55) between the MR-exposed (0% [0/81]) and control (1.8%[3/162]) groups. CONCLUSION. This study showed no adverse effects with regard to neonatal hearing or fetal growth in healthy neonates who were variably exposed to 3-T MR in utero during MRI for various clinical maternal or fetal indications at any gestational age.
引用
收藏
页码:1170 / 1173
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, 2015, ACR SPR PRACT PAR SA
  • [2] Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: exposure times and functional outcomes at preschool age
    Bouyssi-Kobar, Marine
    du Plessis, Adre J.
    Robertson, Richard L.
    Limperopoulos, Catherine
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (12) : 1823 - 1830
  • [3] Bradley William G Jr, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.02.005
  • [4] Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy.
    Bulas, Dorothy
    Egloff, Alexia
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 37 (05) : 301 - 304
  • [5] Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs
    Busa, Jackie
    Harrison, Judy
    Chappell, Jodie
    Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine
    Grimes, Alison
    Brookhouser, Patrick E.
    Epstein, Stephen
    Mehl, Albert
    Vohr, Betty
    Gravel, Judith
    Roush, Jack
    Widen, Judith
    Benedict, Beth S.
    Scoggins, Bobbie
    King, Michelle
    Pippins, Linda
    Savage, David H.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (04) : 898 - 921
  • [6] Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation
    Copel, Joshua
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Heine, R. Phillips
    Wharton, Kurt R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 (02) : E75 - E80
  • [7] A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus
    De Wilde, JP
    Rivers, AW
    Price, DL
    [J]. PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 87 (2-3) : 335 - 353
  • [8] Foster JR, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P157, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<157::AID-JMRI17>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-M
  • [10] Furey Elizabeth A, 2014, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V23, P225, DOI 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000029