The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes

被引:21
作者
Luciano, Anthony A. [1 ]
Luciano, Danielle E. [1 ]
Gabbert, Jessica [2 ]
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Cent Connecticut, Ctr Fertil & Womens Hlth, Obstet & Gynecol, New Britain, CT 06051 USA
[2] InClin, Dept Biometr, San Matteo, CA USA
[3] Intuit Surg, Dept Clin Affairs, Sunnyvale, CA USA
关键词
robotic-assisted hysterectomy; da Vinci surgical system; laparoscopy; abdominal; vaginal; learning curve; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; ASSISTED HYSTERECTOMY; UNITED-STATES; SURGERY; PROSTATECTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1648
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe impact of robotics on benign hysterectomy surgical approach, clinical outcomes, and learning curve is still unclear. MethodsReview of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic cases in 156 US hospitals in the Premier Research Database. ResultsOf 289 875 hysterectomies, abdominal cases decreased from 2005-2010 (60-33%) and minimally invasive approaches increased (40-67%). Conversion rates were: 0.04% for vaginal, 2.5% for robotic, and 7.2% for laparoscopy (P<0.001). Robotic surgery time was longest (3.4h vs. 2.2 vaginal, 2.5 abdominal, 2.7 laparoscopy, P<0.001). Robotic complication rate was lowest (14.8% vs. 16.2% vaginal, 18.6% laparoscopy, 28.9% abdominal, P<0.001). Hospital stay was longer following abdominal surgery (3.5days vs. 1.8 robotic, 1.9 vaginal, 1.8 laparoscopy, P<0.001). Robotic surgery times and conversion and complication rates improved with experience (2.8h, 2%, and 13.9%, respectively), even with increasing complexity. ConclusionsRobotics was successfully incorporated without jeopardizing patient outcomes and increased the overall use of minimally invasive approaches. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 124
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[2]   Socioeconomic and racial predictors of undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for selected benign diseases: Analysis of 341487 hysterectomies [J].
Abenhaim, Haim Arie ;
Azziz, Ricardo ;
Hu, Jianfang ;
Bartolucci, Alfred ;
Tulandi, Togas .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (01) :11-15
[3]  
Advincula Arnold P, 2005, JSLS, V9, P287
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P1156, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72
[6]   Cost Comparison Among Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer [J].
Barnett, Jason C. ;
Judd, John P. ;
Wu, Jennifer M. ;
Scales, Charles D., Jr. ;
Myers, Evan R. ;
Havrilesky, Laura J. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) :685-693
[7]  
Bell MC, 2009, S D MED, V62, P3
[8]   Perioperative Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Cases With Complex Pathology [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Rossi, Emma ;
Hanna, Rabbie .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (03) :585-593
[9]  
Bonilla DJ, 2007, J REPROD MED, V52, P490
[10]   Learning Curve Assessment of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Open-Surgery Controls from the Premier Perspective Database [J].
Davis, John W. ;
Kreaden, Usha S. ;
Gabbert, Jessica ;
Thomas, Raju .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (05) :560-566