Multivariable analysis of tests for the diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction

被引:5
|
作者
Bachmann, LM
Khan, KS
Ogah, J
Owen, P
机构
[1] Princess Royal Matern Unit, Dept Obstet, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Birmingham Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
accuracy; diagnosis; intrauterine growth restriction; regression analysis;
D O I
10.1002/uog.77
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe how data from antenatal fetal ultrasound biometry, amniotic fluid index and umbilical artery Doppler can be appropriately combined using multivariable models and to investigate bow the addition of these ultrasound parameters influences the ability to predict intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Methods This was a prospective cohort study involving 274 low-risk pregnancies undergoing serial ultrasound examination at predetermined intervals. Standard deviation (Z) scores of the last values for fetal abdominal area (FAA), growth velocity of the FAA, amniotic fluid index (AFI) and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index prior to delivery were calculated for 260 fetuses. Customized estimated fetal weight (cEFW) centiles were also calculated using the last EFW before delivery after adjustment for fetal gender, gestational age, birth order and maternal weight, height and ethnic origin. Following delivery the neonatal ponderal index was calculated and centile position obtained. A neonatal ponderal index < 25(th) centile served as the main outcome measure for diagnosis of IUGR. Logistic regression analysis was used to delineate the predictive value of the three fetal growth tests FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW and the additional values of AFI and pulsatility index of the umbilical artery. Results The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves (95% confidence interval) for FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW alone were 0.819 (0.748-0.891), 0.784 (0.699-0.869) and 0.74 (0.643-0.837), respectively, in the prediction of a neonatal ponderal index <25(th) centile. The addition of both the AFI and pulsatility index to FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW generated small increases in the areas, to 0.831 (0.7S8-0.904), 0.817 (0.735-0.899) and 0.766 (0.672-0.859), respectively. These improvements in diagnostic prediction were not statistically significant. Conclusions The addition of AFI and umbilical artery pulsatility index to the fetal biometry parameters did not significantly increase the ROC areas in the study population. The approach applied in this study is useful in the context of hypothesis generation. Further studies using larger data sets and other predictors should be carried out using the analytical techniques outlined in this paper to determine the contribution of various antenatal tests in the prediction of IUGR. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 374
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intrauterine growth restriction: screening and diagnosis using animal models
    Felicioni, Fernando
    Santos, Thais Garcia
    Domingues e Paula, Thais de Merici
    Chiarini-Garcia, Helio
    Campos Lobato de Almeida, Fernanda Radicchi
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION, 2019, 16 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [32] PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF TRIPLOIDY IN A FETUS WITH INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION, RELATIVE MACROCEPHALY AND HOLOPROSENCEPHALY
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Chern, Schu-Rern
    Tsai, Fuu-Jen
    Hsu, Chin-Yuan
    Ko, Kevin
    Wang, Wayseen
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 48 (03): : 323 - 326
  • [33] Transcriptomic analysis of human placenta in intrauterine growth restriction
    Madeleneau, Doriane
    Buffats, Christophe
    Mondon, Francoise
    Grimault, Helene
    Rigourd, Virginie
    Tsatsaris, Vassilis
    Letourneur, Franck
    Vaiman, Daniel
    Barbaux, Sandrine
    Gascoin, Geraldine
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 77 (06) : 799 - 807
  • [34] Transcriptomic analysis of human placenta in intrauterine growth restriction
    Doriane Madeleneau
    Christophe Buffat
    Françoise Mondon
    Hélène Grimault
    Virginie Rigourd
    Vassilis Tsatsaris
    Franck Letourneur
    Daniel Vaiman
    Sandrine Barbaux
    Géraldine Gascoin
    Pediatric Research, 2015, 77 : 799 - 807
  • [35] Microarray analysis of placental tissue in intrauterine growth restriction
    Struwe, E.
    Berzl, G.
    Schild, R.
    Blessing, H.
    Drexel, L.
    Hauck, B.
    Tzschoppe, A.
    Weidinger, M.
    Sachs, M.
    Scheler, C.
    Schleussner, E.
    Doetsch, J.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 72 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [36] Cerebral blood flow studies in the diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction
    Hernandez-Andrade, Edgar
    Stampalija, Tamara
    Figueras, Francesc
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 25 (02) : 138 - 144
  • [37] Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management
    Figueras, Francesc
    Gardosi, Jason
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (04) : 288 - 300
  • [38] Management of intrauterine growth restriction
    Kramer, WB
    Weiner, CP
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04): : 814 - 823
  • [39] Magnesium and intrauterine growth restriction
    Barbosa, NOE
    Okay, TS
    Leone, CR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 2005, 24 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [40] Definitions of intrauterine growth restriction
    Kingdom, J
    Baker, P
    Blair, E
    INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION: AETIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, : 1 - 4