Multivariable analysis of tests for the diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction

被引:5
|
作者
Bachmann, LM
Khan, KS
Ogah, J
Owen, P
机构
[1] Princess Royal Matern Unit, Dept Obstet, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Birmingham Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
accuracy; diagnosis; intrauterine growth restriction; regression analysis;
D O I
10.1002/uog.77
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe how data from antenatal fetal ultrasound biometry, amniotic fluid index and umbilical artery Doppler can be appropriately combined using multivariable models and to investigate bow the addition of these ultrasound parameters influences the ability to predict intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Methods This was a prospective cohort study involving 274 low-risk pregnancies undergoing serial ultrasound examination at predetermined intervals. Standard deviation (Z) scores of the last values for fetal abdominal area (FAA), growth velocity of the FAA, amniotic fluid index (AFI) and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index prior to delivery were calculated for 260 fetuses. Customized estimated fetal weight (cEFW) centiles were also calculated using the last EFW before delivery after adjustment for fetal gender, gestational age, birth order and maternal weight, height and ethnic origin. Following delivery the neonatal ponderal index was calculated and centile position obtained. A neonatal ponderal index < 25(th) centile served as the main outcome measure for diagnosis of IUGR. Logistic regression analysis was used to delineate the predictive value of the three fetal growth tests FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW and the additional values of AFI and pulsatility index of the umbilical artery. Results The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves (95% confidence interval) for FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW alone were 0.819 (0.748-0.891), 0.784 (0.699-0.869) and 0.74 (0.643-0.837), respectively, in the prediction of a neonatal ponderal index <25(th) centile. The addition of both the AFI and pulsatility index to FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW generated small increases in the areas, to 0.831 (0.7S8-0.904), 0.817 (0.735-0.899) and 0.766 (0.672-0.859), respectively. These improvements in diagnostic prediction were not statistically significant. Conclusions The addition of AFI and umbilical artery pulsatility index to the fetal biometry parameters did not significantly increase the ROC areas in the study population. The approach applied in this study is useful in the context of hypothesis generation. Further studies using larger data sets and other predictors should be carried out using the analytical techniques outlined in this paper to determine the contribution of various antenatal tests in the prediction of IUGR. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 374
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Metabolic Pathways in Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Kan, N. E.
    Khachatryan, Z., V
    Chagovets, V. V.
    Starodubtseva, N. L.
    Amiraslanov, E. Yu
    Tyutyunnik, V. L.
    Lomova, N. A.
    Frankevich, V. E.
    BIOCHEMISTRY MOSCOW-SUPPLEMENT SERIES B-BIOMEDICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 14 (04) : 356 - 362
  • [22] Analysis of Metabolic Pathways in Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    N. E. Kan
    Z. V. Khachatryan
    V. V. Chagovets
    N. L. Starodubtseva
    E. Yu. Amiraslanov
    V. L. Tyutyunnik
    N. A. Lomova
    V. E. Frankevich
    Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry, 2020, 14 : 356 - 362
  • [23] A bibliometric analysis of Intrauterine Growth Restriction research
    Aski, Soudabeh Kazemi
    Akbari, Razieh
    Hantoushzadeh, Sedigheh
    Ghotbizadeh, Fahimeh
    PLACENTA, 2020, 95 : 106 - 120
  • [24] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Marsál, K
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [25] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Resnik, R
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (03): : 490 - 496
  • [26] Intrauterine growth restriction
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (01): : C1 - C11
  • [27] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Haram, K
    Softeland, E
    Bukowski, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 93 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [28] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Donoso Bernales, Bernardita
    Oyarzun Ebensperger, Enrique
    MEDWAVE, 2012, 12 (06):
  • [29] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Tan, TYT
    Yeo, GSH
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [30] INTRAUTERINE THERAPY OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION
    Gulcin Gumus, Hatice
    Illa, Miriam
    Pla, Laura
    Crispi, Fatima
    Gratacos, Eduard
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2016, 30