Multivariable analysis of tests for the diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction

被引:5
|
作者
Bachmann, LM
Khan, KS
Ogah, J
Owen, P
机构
[1] Princess Royal Matern Unit, Dept Obstet, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Birmingham Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
accuracy; diagnosis; intrauterine growth restriction; regression analysis;
D O I
10.1002/uog.77
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe how data from antenatal fetal ultrasound biometry, amniotic fluid index and umbilical artery Doppler can be appropriately combined using multivariable models and to investigate bow the addition of these ultrasound parameters influences the ability to predict intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Methods This was a prospective cohort study involving 274 low-risk pregnancies undergoing serial ultrasound examination at predetermined intervals. Standard deviation (Z) scores of the last values for fetal abdominal area (FAA), growth velocity of the FAA, amniotic fluid index (AFI) and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index prior to delivery were calculated for 260 fetuses. Customized estimated fetal weight (cEFW) centiles were also calculated using the last EFW before delivery after adjustment for fetal gender, gestational age, birth order and maternal weight, height and ethnic origin. Following delivery the neonatal ponderal index was calculated and centile position obtained. A neonatal ponderal index < 25(th) centile served as the main outcome measure for diagnosis of IUGR. Logistic regression analysis was used to delineate the predictive value of the three fetal growth tests FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW and the additional values of AFI and pulsatility index of the umbilical artery. Results The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves (95% confidence interval) for FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW alone were 0.819 (0.748-0.891), 0.784 (0.699-0.869) and 0.74 (0.643-0.837), respectively, in the prediction of a neonatal ponderal index <25(th) centile. The addition of both the AFI and pulsatility index to FAA, FAA growth velocity and cEFW generated small increases in the areas, to 0.831 (0.7S8-0.904), 0.817 (0.735-0.899) and 0.766 (0.672-0.859), respectively. These improvements in diagnostic prediction were not statistically significant. Conclusions The addition of AFI and umbilical artery pulsatility index to the fetal biometry parameters did not significantly increase the ROC areas in the study population. The approach applied in this study is useful in the context of hypothesis generation. Further studies using larger data sets and other predictors should be carried out using the analytical techniques outlined in this paper to determine the contribution of various antenatal tests in the prediction of IUGR. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 374
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intrauterine growth curve and application in intrauterine growth restriction diagnosis
    Tipiani-Rodriguez, Oswaldo
    Malaverry, Hector
    Paucar, Mercedes
    Romero, Eliana
    Broncano, Johana
    Aquino, Ruth
    Gamarra, Rosario
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2011, 57 (02): : 69 - 76
  • [2] Sonographic diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction
    Ott, WJ
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04): : 787 - 795
  • [3] Intrauterine Growth restriction - Diagnosis and Management
    Schlembach, Dietmar
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2012, 72 (05) : 373 - 375
  • [4] Intrauterine growth restriction: and management diagnosis
    Waugh, J
    Kilby, M
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2001, 62 (04): : 214 - 221
  • [5] Diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction
    Harkness, UF
    Mari, G
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 31 (04) : 743 - +
  • [6] Does a prenatal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction correspond to a neonatal diagnosis of growth restriction?
    Steinhardt, Linda A.
    Phipps, Maureen G.
    O'Haire, Christen
    Rubin, Lewis P.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04): : 32S - 32S
  • [7] A model for foetal growth and diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction
    Hooper, PA
    Mayes, DC
    Demianczuk, NN
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (01) : 95 - 112
  • [8] Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR): Etiology and Diagnosis
    Suhag, Anju
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (02): : 102 - 111
  • [9] Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR): Etiology and Diagnosis
    Anju Suhag
    Vincenzo Berghella
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (2) : 102 - 111
  • [10] Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Lausman, Andrea
    McCarthy, Fergus P.
    Walker, Melissa
    Kingdom, John
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2012, 34 (01) : 17 - 28