Balancing Convergence and Diversity in Decomposition-Based Many-Objective Optimizers

被引:360
作者
Yuan, Yuan [1 ]
Xu, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Bo [1 ]
Yao, Xin [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Technol, Tsinghua Natl Lab Informat Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Intelligent Technol & Syst, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Comp Sci, Ctr Excellence Res Computat Intelligence & Applic, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Convergence; decomposition; diversity; many-objective optimization; multiobjective optimization; MULTIOBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION; EXPLORATION; SELECTION; MOEA/D;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2015.2443001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The decomposition-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) generally make use of aggregation functions to decompose a multiobjective optimization problem into multiple single-objective optimization problems. However, due to the nature of contour lines for the adopted aggregation functions, they usually fail to preserve the diversity in high-dimensional objective space even by using diverse weight vectors. To address this problem, we propose to maintain the desired diversity of solutions in their evolutionary process explicitly by exploiting the perpendicular distance from the solution to the weight vector in the objective space, which achieves better balance between convergence and diversity in many-objective optimization. The idea is implemented to enhance two well-performing decomposition-based algorithms, i.e., MOEA, based on decomposition and ensemble fitness ranking. The two enhanced algorithms are compared to several state-of-the-art algorithms and a series of comparative experiments are conducted on a number of test problems from two well-known test suites. The experimental results show that the two proposed algorithms are generally more effective than their predecessors in balancing convergence and diversity, and they are also very competitive against other existing algorithms for solving many-objective optimization problems.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 198
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Diversity Management in Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Adra, Salem F. ;
Fleming, Peter J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 15 (02) :183-195
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, AFITDSENG9901 WRIGHT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GENETIC EVOLUTIONARY
[4]   A Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many Objective Optimization [J].
Asafuddoula, M. ;
Ray, Tapabrata ;
Sarker, Ruhul .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (03) :445-460
[5]  
Auger A, 2009, FOGA'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH ACM SIGRVO CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF GENETIC ALGORITHMS, P87
[6]   HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Bader, Johannes ;
Zitzler, Eckart .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) :45-76
[7]  
Bentley PJ, 1998, SOFT COMPUTING IN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, P231
[8]   SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume [J].
Beume, Nicola ;
Naujoks, Boris ;
Emmerich, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) :1653-1669
[9]   On the Properties of the R2 Indicator [J].
Brockhoff, Dimo ;
Wagner, Tobias ;
Trautmann, Heike .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2012, :465-472
[10]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657