DNA methylation profiling identifies CG methylation clusters Arabidopsis genes

被引:165
作者
Tran, RK
Henikoff, JG
Zilberman, D
Ditt, RF
Jacobsen, SE
Henikoff, S
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Mol Cell & Dev Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Mol Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.008
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cytosine DNA methylation in vertebrates is widespread, but methylation in plants is found almost exclusively at transposable elements and repetitive DNA [1]. Within regions of methylation, methylcytosines are typically found in CG, CNG, and asymmetric contexts. CG sites are maintained by a plant homolog of mammalian Dnmt1 acting on hemi-methylated DNA after replication. Methylation of CNG and asymmetric sites appears to be maintained at each cell cycle by other mechanisms. We report a new type of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis, dense CG methylation clusters found at scattered sites throughout the genome. These clusters lack non-CG methylation and are preferentially found in genes, although they are relatively deficient toward the 5' end. CG methylation clusters are present in lines derived from different accessions and in mutants that eliminate de novo methylation, indicating that CG methylation clusters are stably maintained at specific sites. Because 5-methylcytosine is mutagenic, the appearance of CG methylation clusters over evolutionary time predicts a genome-wide deficiency of CG dinucleotides and an excess of C(A/T)G tri-nucleotides within transcribed regions. This is exactly what we find, implying that CG methylation clusters have contributed profoundly to plant gene evolution. We suggest that CG methylation clusters silence cryptic promoters that arise sporadically within transcription units.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 159
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes [J].
Baldi, P ;
Long, AD .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, 17 (06) :509-519
[2]   DNA methylation and epigenetics [J].
Bender, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2004, 55 :41-68
[3]   GENE NUMBER, NOISE-REDUCTION AND BIOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY [J].
BIRD, AP .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 1995, 11 (03) :94-100
[4]   DNA METHYLATION AND THE FREQUENCY OF CPG IN ANIMAL DNA [J].
BIRD, AP .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1980, 8 (07) :1499-1504
[5]   PREDICTING DNA DUPLEX STABILITY FROM THE BASE SEQUENCE [J].
BRESLAUER, KJ ;
FRANK, R ;
BLOCKER, H ;
MARKY, LA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1986, 83 (11) :3746-3750
[6]   Role of the DRM and CMT3 Methyltransferases in RNA-directed DNA methylation [J].
Cao, XF ;
Aufsatz, W ;
Zilberman, D ;
Mette, MF ;
Huang, MS ;
Matzke, M ;
Jacobsen, SE .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (24) :2212-2217
[7]  
DELCOURT SG, 1991, J BIOL CHEM, V266, P15160
[8]   Histone variants, nucleosome assembly and epigenetic inheritance [J].
Henikoff, S ;
Furuyama, T ;
Ahmad, K .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2004, 20 (07) :320-326
[9]   RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in plants can be inherited independently of the RNA trigger and requires Met1 for maintenance [J].
Jones, L ;
Ratcliff, F ;
Baulcombe, DF .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (10) :747-757
[10]   Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites [J].
Kaplan, CD ;
Laprade, L ;
Winston, F .
SCIENCE, 2003, 301 (5636) :1096-1099