Reliability of home blood pressure monitoring devices in pregnancy

被引:20
|
作者
Tremonti, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Beddoe, Jennifer [3 ]
Brown, Mark A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal North Shore Hosp, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[2] Sutherland Hosp, Sutherland, NSW 2229, Australia
[3] St George Hosp, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
关键词
Home blood pressure monitors; Gestational hypertension; Pregnancy; Blood pressure; Automated BP; HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY PROTOCOL; SELF-MEASUREMENT; INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; VALIDATION; PREECLAMPSIA; ACCURACY; WOMEN; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.preghy.2017.01.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Home blood pressure monitors are freely available and used for women during pregnancy. The exact role of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy remains uncertain, and few such monitors have been validated for use in pregnancy. As it has been our Unit's policy to test these devices against sphygmomanometry (as the gold standard) before clinical use for some years now, we undertook this study to ascertain the degree of accuracy or inaccuracy of these devices in usual clinical practice. We analysed 9 consecutive blood pressures (BP) alternately using an automated home BP device and sphygmomanometry in 127 pregnant women with hypertension using two different methods: a) a modified version of the British Hypertension Society's guidelines for analysing automated devices, and b) examining the difference between the mean of blood pressure readings by the device and sphygmomanometry for each patient. 87 devices (69%) had systolic BP within 5 mmHg or less and 98 (77%) were within 5 mmHg for diastolic BP. The frequency of systolic BPs within 5 mmHg was similar for non-validated vs. validated devices (75 vs. 60%; p = 0.23). Similarly, diastolic BP within 5 mmHg was similar for non-validated vs. validated devices (86 vs. 68%, p = 0.06). Our findings showed that a wide variety of devices are used and few if any have been formally validated for use in pregnancy. As a group the devices provide accurate BP in the majority of women, but up to a quarter will have a BP difference of at least 5 mmHg, and this is not related to the absolute BP. Furthermore using a home BP device validated for general use in non-pregnant subjects appeared as reliable as using other non-validated devices. On the basis of these data we recommended clinicians always perform their own analysis of a patient's home BP machine accuracy prior to home use using a simple protocol as described here, even if the machine has been validated for general use. (C) 2017 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 14
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of the SunTech Medical Advantage Model 2 Series Automated Blood Pressure Module in Pregnancy
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Dotson, Kristin N.
    Anderson, Sarah B.
    Harris, Stacy L.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 36 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [42] The effects of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and treatment planning
    Erden, Sacide
    Ozkaya, Hande Mefkure
    Denizeri, Sabiha Banu
    Karabacak, Emrah
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2016, 128 (06) : 584 - 590
  • [43] Home blood pressure monitoring devices: what extra value do they bring?
    Divison-Garrote, Juan Antonio
    Gonzalvez, Paula Juarez
    Turegano-Yedro, Miguel
    Pallares-Carratala, Vicente
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2024, 21 (07) : 555 - 557
  • [44] Is Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Useful in the Management of Patients With Resistant Hypertension?
    Muxfeldt, Elizabeth S.
    Barros, Guilherme S.
    Viegas, Bianca B.
    Carlos, Fernanda O.
    Salles, Gil F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 28 (02) : 190 - 199
  • [45] Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension: A Systematic Review
    Stergiou, George S.
    Bliziotis, Ioannis A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 24 (02) : 123 - 134
  • [46] Use of oscillometric devices in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of three devices and invasive blood pressure measurement
    Halfon, Matthieu
    Wuerzner, Gregoire
    Marques-Vidal, Pedro
    Taffe, Patrick
    Vaucher, Julien
    Waeber, Bernard
    Liaudet, Lucas
    Ltaief, Zied
    Popov, Milen
    Waeber, Gerard
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2018, 27 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [47] Home monitoring of blood pressure in pregnancy at high risk of pre-eclampsia
    Waugh, J
    Bosio, P
    Habiba, M
    Boyce, T
    Shennan, A
    Halligan, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 99 (01): : 109 - 111
  • [48] Sampling requirements for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy
    Hermida, RC
    Ayala, DE
    HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (04) : 619 - 624
  • [49] A systematic review of variability and reliability of manual and automated blood pressure readings
    Skirton, Heather
    Chamberlain, Wendy
    Lawson, Caroline
    Ryan, Helen
    Young, Emma
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (5-6) : 602 - 614
  • [50] Home blood pressure measurement in women with pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders
    Lan, Patrick G.
    Hyett, Jon
    Gillin, Adrian G.
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2017, 10 : 213 - 219