Reliability of home blood pressure monitoring devices in pregnancy

被引:20
|
作者
Tremonti, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Beddoe, Jennifer [3 ]
Brown, Mark A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal North Shore Hosp, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[2] Sutherland Hosp, Sutherland, NSW 2229, Australia
[3] St George Hosp, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
关键词
Home blood pressure monitors; Gestational hypertension; Pregnancy; Blood pressure; Automated BP; HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY PROTOCOL; SELF-MEASUREMENT; INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; VALIDATION; PREECLAMPSIA; ACCURACY; WOMEN; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.preghy.2017.01.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Home blood pressure monitors are freely available and used for women during pregnancy. The exact role of home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy remains uncertain, and few such monitors have been validated for use in pregnancy. As it has been our Unit's policy to test these devices against sphygmomanometry (as the gold standard) before clinical use for some years now, we undertook this study to ascertain the degree of accuracy or inaccuracy of these devices in usual clinical practice. We analysed 9 consecutive blood pressures (BP) alternately using an automated home BP device and sphygmomanometry in 127 pregnant women with hypertension using two different methods: a) a modified version of the British Hypertension Society's guidelines for analysing automated devices, and b) examining the difference between the mean of blood pressure readings by the device and sphygmomanometry for each patient. 87 devices (69%) had systolic BP within 5 mmHg or less and 98 (77%) were within 5 mmHg for diastolic BP. The frequency of systolic BPs within 5 mmHg was similar for non-validated vs. validated devices (75 vs. 60%; p = 0.23). Similarly, diastolic BP within 5 mmHg was similar for non-validated vs. validated devices (86 vs. 68%, p = 0.06). Our findings showed that a wide variety of devices are used and few if any have been formally validated for use in pregnancy. As a group the devices provide accurate BP in the majority of women, but up to a quarter will have a BP difference of at least 5 mmHg, and this is not related to the absolute BP. Furthermore using a home BP device validated for general use in non-pregnant subjects appeared as reliable as using other non-validated devices. On the basis of these data we recommended clinicians always perform their own analysis of a patient's home BP machine accuracy prior to home use using a simple protocol as described here, even if the machine has been validated for general use. (C) 2017 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 14
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring blood pressure in pregnancy and postpartum: assessing the reliability of automated measuring devices
    Lan, Patrick G.
    Clayton, Philip A.
    Hyett, Jon
    Gillin, Adrian G.
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2014, 33 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [2] The Cloud DX connected HealthKit Pulsewave in home blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy: A clinical evaluation and user experience study
    Hofstede, A.
    Lomme, M.
    Gosselink, S.
    van Drongelen, J.
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2022, 28 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy A Systematic Review of Validation Studies
    Bello, Natalie A.
    Woolley, Jonathan J.
    Cleary, Kirsten Lawrence
    Falzon, Louise
    Alpert, Bruce S.
    Oparil, Suzanne
    Cutter, Gary
    Wapner, Ronald
    Muntner, Paul
    Tita, Alan T.
    Shimbo, Daichi
    HYPERTENSION, 2018, 71 (02) : 326 - 335
  • [4] Validation of the iHealth Track and Omron HEM-9210T automated blood pressure devices for use in pregnancy
    Van Den Heuvel, Josephus F. M.
    Lely, A. Titia
    Franx, Arie
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2019, 15 : 37 - 41
  • [5] Ambulatory monitoring and self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy
    Waugh, JJS
    Halligan, AWF
    Shennan, AH
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2000, 5 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [6] Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home blood pressure device in pregnancy for medium and large arm circumferences
    Clark, Katherine
    Snowball, Olivia
    Nzelu, Diane
    Kay, Polly
    Kametas, Nikos A.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2018, 23 (03) : 171 - 174
  • [7] Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home
    Chung, Yealin
    de Greeff, Annemarie
    Shennan, Andrew
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2009, 28 (03) : 348 - 359
  • [8] Is there a role for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy?
    Brown, Mark A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 41 (01): : 16 - 21
  • [9] Use of automated home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: Is it safe?
    Lo, C
    Taylor, RS
    Gamble, G
    McCowan, L
    North, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (05) : 1321 - 1328
  • [10] Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy and in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: devices, techniques and challenges
    Ngene, Nnabuike C.
    Moodley, Jagidesa
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2019, 30 (02) : 120 - 129