Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre 'Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance' study

被引:130
|
作者
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. [1 ]
Vasarainen, Hanna [9 ]
van der Poel, Henk G. [3 ]
Vis-Maters, Jenneke J. [4 ]
Rietbergen, John B. [2 ]
Pickles, Tom [10 ]
Cornel, Erik B. [5 ]
Valdagni, Riccardo [11 ]
Jaspars, Joris J. [6 ]
van der Hoeven, John [7 ]
Staerman, Frederic [12 ]
Oomens, Eric H. G. M. [8 ]
Rannikko, Antti [9 ]
Roemeling, Stijn [1 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Schroder, Fritz H. [1 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] St Franciscus Hosp, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Albert Schweitzer Hosp, Dept Urol, Dordrecht, Netherlands
[5] Hosp Grp Twente, Dept Urol, Hengelo, Netherlands
[6] Oosterschelde Hosp, Dept Urol, Goes, Netherlands
[7] Reinier de Graaf Hosp, Dept Urol, Delft, Netherlands
[8] Amphia Hosp, Dept Urol, Breda, Netherlands
[9] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Helsinki, Finland
[10] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Radiat Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[11] Fdn IRCCS Inst Nazl Tumori, Sci Directorate, Prostate Program, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[12] Ctr Hosp Univ, Dept Urol, Reims, France
关键词
active surveillance; biopsy; outcomes; prostate cancer; PSA; watchful waiting; MANAGEMENT; BIOPSY; MEN; PROGRESSION; VALIDATION; ANTIGEN; ANXIETY; TRIAL; GRADE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08887.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the short-term outcomes of the prospective international Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance ('PRIAS') study (Dutch Trial Register NTR1718), as active surveillance (AS) for early prostate cancer might provide a partial solution to the current overtreatment dilemma in this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS The first 500 (of > 950) participants with asymptomatic T1c/T2 prostate cancer, with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < 10.0 ng/mL, a PSA density of < 0.2 ng/mL/mL, a Gleason score of < 3 + 3 = 6, and one or two positive biopsy cores, were analysed. The follow-up protocol consisted of frequent PSA measurements, digital rectal examinations, and standard repeat biopsies (the first after 1 year). The primary outcome is survival free of active therapy; the secondary endpoints are reasons for stopping AS, findings in 1-year repeat biopsies, and outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS Patients were included between December 2006 and July 2008. The median (25-75th percentile) follow-up after diagnosis was 1.02 (0.6-1.5) years. The 2-year survival rate free from active therapy was 73%. Of the 82 men who changed to active therapy during the follow-up, 68 (83%) did so based on the protocol. Of the 261 repeat biopsies available for analysis, 90 (34%) showed no cancer, while 57 (22%) showed a Gleason score of > 6 or more than two positive biopsy cores. There was a relatively unfavourable PSA doubling time of 0-10 years in 53% (102/194) and 62% (33/53) of men with favourable and unfavourable re-biopsy results, respectively. After RP, four of 24 (17%) men had T3 disease and 12 (50%) had a Gleason score of > 6. CONCLUSION AS seems feasible, but mortality outcomes are unknown. A strict follow-up protocol including standard 1-year repeat biopsies resulted in a quarter of men stopping AS after 2 years.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 962
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [42] Longitudinal evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a predictor of Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance reclassification
    Ota, Eri
    Mori, Naoko
    Yamashita, Shinichi
    Mugikura, Shunji
    Ito, Akihiro
    Takase, Kei
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (02) : 814 - 826
  • [43] Selecting men diagnosed with prostate cancer for active surveillance using a risk calculator: a prospective impact study
    van Vugt, Heidi A.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    van Muilekom, Erik H. A. M.
    Busstra, Martijn
    Kil, Paul
    Oomens, Eric H.
    Leliveld, Annemarie
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Korfage, Ida
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (02) : 180 - 187
  • [44] Limited ability of existing nomograms to predict outcomes in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Wang, Siao-Yi
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Cary, K. Clint
    Chan, June M.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (6B) : E18 - E24
  • [45] Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Koie, Takuya
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Kakoi, Narihiko
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Ohyama, Chikara
    Arai, Yoichi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 914 - 920
  • [46] Prospective Implementation and Early Outcomes of a Risk-stratified Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Follow-up Protocol
    Thankapannair, Vineetha
    Keates, Alexandra
    Barrett, Tristan
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 49 : 15 - 22
  • [47] Prospective quality-of-life outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer: Active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Hurwitz, Lauren M.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Levie, Katherine E.
    Odem-Davis, Katherine
    Johnston, Richard B.
    Pham, Khanh N.
    Rosner, Inger L.
    Brand, Timothy C.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Sterbis, Joseph R.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Porter, Christopher R.
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (14) : 2465 - 2473
  • [48] Prospective Observational Study of a Racially Diverse Group of Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Greenberg, Jacob W.
    Leinwand, Gabriel
    Feibus, Allison H.
    Haney, Nora M.
    Krane, L. Spencer
    Thomas, Raju
    Sartor, Oliver
    Silberstein, Jonathan L.
    UROLOGY, 2021, 148 : 203 - 210
  • [49] An assessment of Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria for active surveillance of clinically low-risk prostate cancer patients
    da Silva, Vitor
    Cagiannos, Ilias
    Lavallee, Luke T.
    Mallick, Ranjeeta
    Witiuk, Kelsey
    Cnossen, Sonya
    Eastham, James A.
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Morash, Chris
    Breau, Rodney H.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (08): : 238 - 243
  • [50] Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Masic, Selma
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (05): : 386 - 394