Cooperative sUAV Collision Avoidance Based on Satisficing Theory

被引:6
作者
Kim, Namwoo [1 ]
Yoon, Yoonjin [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
关键词
Small unmanned aerial vehicles (sUAV); Collision avoidance; Satisficing theory; UAS traffic management; AIR-TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; CONFLICT-RESOLUTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s42405-019-00183-4
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The recent growth in small unmanned aerial vehicle (sUAV) applications in public and private sectors has generated a greater interest in effective collision avoidance strategies. This paper presents a cooperative collision avoidance approach for sUAV in the low-altitude uncontrolled airspace based on satisficing game theory. By incorporating both the self and cooperative preferences in making individual heading decision, satisficing framework provides a collision avoidance strategy that increases throughput while decreasing unnecessary collisions. A total of 4356 chokepoint scenarios are simulated with varying satisficing parameters, including number of sUAV agents, minimum separation, action angle, and dual utility parameters of raw preference and negotiation index. Simulation-based sensitivity analysis is conducted to find the combined effect of such parameters. The results show that performance of satisficing framework is dependent on traffic density primarily. Except for the very light traffic scenario, the minimum separation and degree of action angle affected the system efficiency the most, while dual utility parameters played crucial roles in highly conflicted scenarios. In conclusion, sUAV traffic and collision rules require an adaptive approach in regard to the traffic density, and satisficing framework can provide an effective collision avoidance strategy in a medium- to high-density traffic environment.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 986
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SY
  • [2] A satisficing approach to aircraft conflict resolution
    Archibald, James K.
    Hill, Jared C.
    Jepsen, Nicholas A.
    Stirling, Wynn C.
    Frost, Richard L.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2008, 38 (04): : 510 - 521
  • [3] Bai HY, 2012, ROBOTICS: SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS VII, P1
  • [4] Bellomi F., 2008, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, V16, P211, DOI [10.2514/atcq, DOI 10.2514/ATCQ]
  • [5] A novel 3D geometric algorithm for aircraft autonomous collision avoidance
    Carbone, C.
    Ciniglio, U.
    Corraro, F.
    Luongo, S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 1580 - 1585
  • [6] CUI P, 2017, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2017, P1
  • [7] Eby M. S., 1999, 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH8403), P429, DOI 10.1109/AERO.1999.793186
  • [8] Eby M. S., 1994, Lincoln Laboratory Journal, V7, P239
  • [9] Hill J, 2005, AIAA GUID NAV CONTR, P6049
  • [10] Johnson FR, 2005, 2005 IEEE NETWORKING, SENSING AND CONTROL PROCEEDINGS, P123