Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Aziz, Muhammad [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohaib [2 ]
Haghbin, Hossein [3 ]
Pervez, Asad [4 ]
Goyal, Hemant [5 ]
Kamal, Faisal [6 ]
Kobeissy, Abdallah [1 ]
Nawras, Ali [1 ]
Adler, Douglas G. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Internal Med, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ascens Providence Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Southfield, MI USA
[4] West Virginia Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[5] Wright Ctr Grad Med Educ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Scranton, PA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Porter Adventist Hosp, Ctr Adv Therapeut Endoscopy CATE, Centura Hlth, Peak Gastroenterol, Denver, CO 80210 USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; BOWEL PREPARATION; RISK-FACTORS; WHITE-LIGHT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ENDOSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1794-0346
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique. Methods A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonianLaird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value was generated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 +/- 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8%) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06-1.34], P = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using iscan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07-1.47], P = 0.004). Conclusions i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:E824 / E831
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of linked color imaging on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zwetkoff, Bruna Haueisen Figueiredo
    Alberti, Luiz Ronaldo
    Rodrigues, Fabio Gontijo
    Carvas Junior, Nelson
    Ardengh, Jose Celso
    Neto, Otavio Micelli
    Guzman, Fernando Rodrigues
    Dias, Marcelo Morganti Ferreira
    Canejo, Guilherme Camarotti de Oliveira
    dos Santos, Carlos Eduardo Oliveira
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [22] Increased Detection of Colorectal Polyps in Screening Colonoscopy Using High Definition i-SCAN Compared with Standard White Light
    Kim, Woo Jung
    Park, Sang Young
    Park, Iksoo
    Lee, Wook Jin
    Park, Jaechan
    Chon, Nuri
    Oh, Tak Geun
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 49 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [23] G-EYE™ High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate Compared to Standard High Definition Colonoscopy: Results of Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial
    Gross, Seth A.
    Shirin, Haim
    Mizrahi, Meir
    Abramowich, Dov
    Stigaard, Trine
    Gluck, Nathan
    Shnell, Mati
    Vilmann, Peter
    Ishaq, Sauid
    Epshtein, Julia
    Hendel, Jakob
    Simantov, Roman
    Moshkowitz, Menachem
    Hoffman, Arthur
    Yaari, Shaul
    Yair, Michael
    Jacob, Harold
    Shpak, Beni
    Viale, Edi
    Neumann, Helmut
    Goetz, Martin
    Testoni, Pieralberta
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Pochapin, Mark
    Kiesslich, Ralf
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S616 - S617
  • [24] Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shao, Lei
    Yan, Xinzong
    Liu, Chengjiang
    Guo, Can
    Cai, Baojia
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (46) : E31945
  • [25] Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists
    Lee, Jong Yoon
    Koh, Myeongseok
    Lee, Jong Hoon
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (08) : 2756 - 2762
  • [26] Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists
    Jong Yoon Lee
    Myeongseok Koh
    Jong Hoon Lee
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2021, 66 : 2756 - 2762
  • [27] Does Hyoscine improve polyp detection rate during colonoscopy? Systematic Review & meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Hureibi, Khalid
    Abraham, Pradip
    Alsunidar, Osama
    Evans, Charles
    Leong, Kai
    Wong, Ling
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2018, 36 : 41 - 46
  • [28] Does cap colonoscopy improve colonoscopy in the East and the West? A meta-analysis of insertion parameters and adenoma detection
    Gill, Raghubinder S.
    Corte, Crispin J.
    Kaffes, Arthur
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 125 - 126
  • [29] Use of 2 Observers Increases Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Weissman, Simcha
    Khan, Zubair
    Fatima, Rawish
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Nawras, Ali
    Adler, Douglas G.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 18 (05) : 1240 - +
  • [30] Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Piovani, Daniele
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Parigi, Tommaso
    Khalaf, Kareem
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Roesch, Thomas
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Mori, Yuichi
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Bonovas, Stefanos
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (02) : 212 - +