Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Aziz, Muhammad [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohaib [2 ]
Haghbin, Hossein [3 ]
Pervez, Asad [4 ]
Goyal, Hemant [5 ]
Kamal, Faisal [6 ]
Kobeissy, Abdallah [1 ]
Nawras, Ali [1 ]
Adler, Douglas G. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Internal Med, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ascens Providence Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Southfield, MI USA
[4] West Virginia Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[5] Wright Ctr Grad Med Educ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Scranton, PA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Porter Adventist Hosp, Ctr Adv Therapeut Endoscopy CATE, Centura Hlth, Peak Gastroenterol, Denver, CO 80210 USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; BOWEL PREPARATION; RISK-FACTORS; WHITE-LIGHT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ENDOSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1794-0346
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique. Methods A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonianLaird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value was generated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 +/- 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8%) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06-1.34], P = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using iscan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07-1.47], P = 0.004). Conclusions i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:E824 / E831
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DOES I-SCAN IMPROVE ADENOMA DETECTION RATE COMPARED TO HIGH-DEFINITION COLONOSCOPY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Zohaib
    Haghbin, Hossein
    Pervez, Asad
    Goyal, Hemant
    Kamal, Faisal
    Kobeissy, Abdallah
    Nawras, Ali
    Adler, Douglas G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB112 - AB112
  • [2] The incremental yield of adenoma detection with I-Scan versus high-definition white light colonoscopy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Maryam R. Hussain
    Faisal S. Ali
    Apoorva Tangri
    Shahrooz Rashtak
    Mairin Joseph-Talreja
    Pritesh R. Mutha
    Vaibhav Wadhwa
    Sushovan Guha
    Roy Tomas DaVee
    Nirav Thosani
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [3] The incremental yield of adenoma detection with I-Scan versus high-definition white light colonoscopy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Hussain, Maryam R.
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Tangri, Apoorva
    Rashtak, Shahrooz
    Joseph-Talreja, Mairin
    Mutha, Pritesh R.
    Wadhwa, Vaibhav
    Guha, Sushovan
    Davee, Roy Tomas
    Thosani, Nirav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [4] Correction to: The incremental yield of adenoma detection with I-Scan versus high-definition white light colonoscopy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Maryam R. Hussain
    Faisal S. Ali
    Apoorva Tangri
    Shahrooz Rashtak
    Mairin Joseph-Talreja
    Pritesh R. Mutha
    Vaibhav Wadhwa
    Sushovan Guha
    Roy Tomas DaVee
    Nirav Thosani
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [5] Incremental Yield of Adenoma Detection with High-Definition I-Scan Colonoscopy Compared to White Light Endoscopy-A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ali, Faisal
    Thosani, Nirav
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S126 - S126
  • [6] High-definition colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Tziatzios, Georgios
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Lazaridis, Lazaros Dimitrios
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (05) : 1027 - +
  • [7] Efficacy of Endocuff Vision compared to first-generation Endocuff in adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate in high-definition colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Haghbin, Hossein
    Gangwani, Manesh Kumar
    Sharma, Sachit
    Nawras, Yusuf
    Khan, Zubair
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Nawras, Ali
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (01) : E41 - E50
  • [8] High-definition i-Scan colonoscopy is superior in the detection of diminutive polyps compared with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective randomized-controlled trial
    Shan, Jing
    Liu, Li
    Sun, Xiaobin
    Xi, Weidong
    Yang, Mei
    Tang, Yu
    Ren, Chunrong
    Shi, Wei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 29 (11) : 1309 - 1313
  • [9] High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate
    Jrebi, Nezar Y.
    Hefty, Matthew
    Jalouta, Tarek
    Ogilvie, James
    Davis, Alan T.
    Asgeirsson, Theodor
    Luchtefeld, Martin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (01): : 78 - 84
  • [10] High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate
    Nezar Y. Jrebi
    Matthew Hefty
    Tarek Jalouta
    James Ogilvie
    Alan T. Davis
    Theodor Asgeirsson
    Martin Luchtefeld
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 78 - 84