Geographical mobility of general practitioners in rural Australia

被引:42
作者
McGrail, Matthew R. [1 ]
Humphreys, John S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Churchill, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Strathdale, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RECRUITMENT; RETENTION;
D O I
10.5694/mja14.01375
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the geographical mobility of general practitioners in Australia, both within rural areas and between rural and metropolitan areas. Design and participants: Annual panel survey of GPs between 2008 and 2012. Main outcome measures: Work location, categorised by a typology based on geographical location and community size; frequency of mobility (change of location category); and characteristics of those who moved. Results: There were 3906 participants in 2008 (representative cohort, 19% of Australia's GP workforce) and 3502, 3514, 3287 and 3361 in subsequent years. 1810 GPs participated in all 5 years, and 10 900 origin-destination pairs were observed after removing GP registrars from the dataset. A total of 133 GPs moved from rural to metropolitan locations, 103 moved from metropolitan to rural locations, and 271 observed location changes were within rural areas. Annual location retention rates were 95% in regional centres, 90% in small rural towns and 82% in very remote areas. GPs in small towns of < 5000 residents had the highest risk of leaving rural practice. Mobility rates were significantly higher for GPs who had worked in a location for under 3 years and those working as either contracted or salaried employees, and somewhat higher for international medical graduates. Younger age was a small predictor of increased mobility, while sex and family status had no association with mobility. Conclusion: GPs working in small communities and those in a rural location for less than 3 years are most at risk of leaving rural practice.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / U55
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Adhikari M, 1993, P 2 NAT RUR HLTH C F
  • [2] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2008, INT ENC PUBL HLTH
  • [3] Bourgeault IL, 2011, 13 INT HLTH WORKFORC
  • [4] Not enough there, too many here: Understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce
    Dussault G.
    Franceschini M.C.
    [J]. Human Resources for Health, 4 (1)
  • [5] Hawthorne L., 2011, 13 INT HLTH WORKFORC
  • [6] Who should receive recruitment and retention incentives? Improved targeting of rural doctors using medical workforce data
    Humphreys, John S.
    McGrail, Matthew R.
    Joyce, Catherine M.
    Scott, Anthony
    Kalb, Guyonne
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2012, 20 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [7] Inoue K, 2009, RURAL REMOTE HEALTH, V9
  • [8] The "Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL)" longitudinal survey - Protocol and baseline data for a prospective cohort study of Australian doctors' workforce participation
    Joyce, Catherine M.
    Scott, Anthony
    Jeon, Sung-Hee
    Humphreys, John
    Kalb, Guyonne
    Witt, Julia
    Leahy, Anne
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
  • [9] Mason J., 2013, Review of Australian government health workforce programs
  • [10] Mazumdar S, 2014, 2014 PRIM HLTH CAR R